From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>,
jeremy@xensource.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Bug during kexec...not all cpus are stopped
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:17:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012221717.GA27478@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1hbgs5qkc.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:10:11PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:41:23PM -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> > I don't think that kdump path uses smp_send_stop().
>
> It doesn't.
>
> > IIUC, on x86, we directly send NMI to other cpus.
> >
> > native_machine_crash_shutdown()
> > kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus()
> > nmi_shootdown_cpus()
> > smp_send_nmi_allbutself
> > apic->send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR);
> >
> > So above description should be limited to only panic() path.
>
> Is it actually confusing? With respect to documenting the line
> of thinking it seems reasonable.
>
No, just wanted to point out that let us modify the changelog to remove
keyword "kdump" from it.
> > On a side note, I am wondering why panic() and kdump path can't share the
> > shutdown routine.
>
> Hysterical raisins. Andi's change to smp_send_stop says that NMIs not
> working on some boxes. When someone wants to weed through all of the
> insanity it would probably be good to get the panic and the kdump paths
> sharing code. For now simply separating panic and reboot should be
> enough, and it lets the code evolve where it needs to.
>
Ok. Agreed that atleast conceptually kdump and panic() path should share
the code. But that's a different problem altogether and this patch can go in.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 20:34 [RFC PATCH] Bug during kexec...not all cpus are stopped Alok Kataria
2010-10-11 17:09 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-11 18:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-11 19:41 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-11 21:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-11 21:37 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-21 21:40 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, kexec: Make sure to stop all CPUs before exiting the kernel tip-bot for Alok Kataria
2010-10-11 21:39 ` [RFC PATCH] Bug during kexec...not all cpus are stopped Vivek Goyal
2010-10-11 21:47 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-11 22:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-12 22:17 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2010-10-13 0:23 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-21 19:09 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-21 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-21 21:10 ` Alok Kataria
2010-10-21 21:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101012221717.GA27478@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox