linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] perf: Add ability to dump part of the user stack
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:01:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101013150102.GE5335@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286954537.29097.59.camel@twins>

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:22:17AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 07:06 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > @@ -227,6 +227,12 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
> >         __u32                   bp_type;
> >         __u64                   bp_addr;
> >         __u64                   bp_len;
> > +
> > +       __u64                   __reserved_2;
> > +       __u64                   __reserved_3;
> > +
> > +       __u32                   ustack_dump_size;
> > +       __u32                   __reserved_4;
> >  }; 
> 
> Why add those two __u64 fields?


Because I suspect one day the breakpoint fields will need to be
extended. Some archs have quite fancy features for breakpoints
that include value comparison for example. So a field could be
used for the comparison operator and the other for the value
to be compared against.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-13 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-13  5:06 [RFC] perf: Dwarf cfi based user callchains Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] uaccess: Make copy_from_user_nmi() globally available Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  7:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-13 14:47     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13 20:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] perf: Add ability to dump user regs Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  7:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-13 14:56     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13 14:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-14 11:06     ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-14 11:20       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-15  8:39         ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-15 22:58           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-17 10:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 10:01               ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-18 22:35                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-20  9:24                   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-20 16:13                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-20 16:19                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] perf: Add ability to dump part of the user stack Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  7:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-13 15:01     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] perf: Don't record frame pointer based user stacktraces if we dump stack and regs Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  7:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-13 15:02     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-16  0:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] perf: Support for dwarf mode callchain on perf record Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] perf: Build with dwarf cfi Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  5:06 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] perf: Support for error passed over pointers Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] perf: Add libunwind dependency for dwarf cfi unwinding Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13  5:07 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] perf: Support for dwarf cfi unwinding on post processing Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-13 15:13 ` [RFC] perf: Dwarf cfi based user callchains Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-10-20 15:35   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101013150102.GE5335@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).