From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make div64_u64() precise on 32bit platforms
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:11:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101014121159.GA407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101013213746.GA27248@redhat.com>
On 10/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 10/12, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> >
> > u64 div64_u64(u64 dividend, u64 divisor)
> > {
> > - u32 high, d;
> > -
> > - high = divisor >> 32;
> > - if (high) {
> > - unsigned int shift = fls(high);
> > + u64 u0, quot0, quot1;
> > + u32 rem;
> > + int n;
> > +
> > + if (divisor >> 32 == 0) {
> > + if (dividend >> 32 < divisor) {
> > + return div_u64_rem(dividend, divisor, &rem);
> > + } else {
> > + u0 = dividend & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> > + quot1 = div_u64_rem(dividend >> 32, divisor, &rem);
> > + u0 += ((u64)rem << 32);
> > + quot0 = div_u64_rem(u0, divisor, &rem);
> > + return (quot1 << 32) + quot0;
> > + }
>
> Looks correct... but I can't understand these complications.
> Looks like we can just do
>
> if ((divisor >> 32) == 0) {
> div_u64(dividend, divisor);
> } else {
> ...
>
> No?
>
> > + } else {
> > + n = __builtin_clzll(divisor);
> > + quot1 = div_u64_rem(dividend >> 1, (divisor << n) >> 32, &rem);
> > + quot0 = (quot1 << n) >> 31;
>
> I can't understand this "dividend >> 1". It seems to me that
>
> quot1 = div_u64(dividend, (divisor << n) >> 32);
> quot0 = (quot1 << n) >> 32;
>
> should be equally correct. Or I missed some overflow?
Thinking more about this with a fresh head, we don't event need quot1,
unless I missed something. We can do
quot0 = div_u64((dividend << n) >> 32, (divisor << n) >> 32);
instead. Or, better,
n = 32 - __builtin_clzll(divisor);
quot0 = div_u64(dividend >> n, divisor >> n);
And 32 - clzll == fls.
So, I think it can be really trivial, see the test-case below,
seems to work (you need 64bit machine to test).
What do you think? I do not trust my math skills.
Oleg.
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/fcntl.h>
#include <assert.h>
typedef unsigned long long u64;
typedef unsigned long u32;
static inline u64 div_u64(u64 A, u32 B)
{
return A / B;
}
static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word)
{
asm("bsr %1,%0"
: "=r" (word)
: "rm" (word));
return word;
}
u64 div64_u64(u64 A, u64 B)
{
u32 high = B >> 32;
u64 quot;
if (high == 0) {
quot = div_u64(A, B);
} else {
int n = 1 + __fls(high);
quot = div_u64(A >> n, B >> n);
if (quot != 0)
quot--;
if ((A - quot * B) >= B)
quot++;
}
return quot;
}
int main(void)
{
int fd, n;
fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY);
assert(fd >= 0);
for (n = 1;; ++n) {
u64 xx[2], rs;
assert(read(fd, xx, sizeof(xx)) == sizeof(xx));
if (xx[1] == 0)
continue;
rs = div64_u64(xx[0], xx[1]);
if (rs != xx[0] / xx[1]) {
printf("ERR!! %llx / %llx = %llx : %llx\n",
xx[0] , xx[1], xx[0] / xx[1], rs);
return 1;
}
if (!(n %100000))
printf("passed: %d\n", n);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-14 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 19:26 [PATCH] Make div64_u64() precise on 32bit platforms Brian Behlendorf
2010-10-13 21:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-10-14 12:11 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-10-21 17:46 ` Brian Behlendorf
2010-10-21 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-10-21 19:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-21 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-02 16:09 [PATCH] trivial, document that div64_u64() is not " Oleg Nesterov
2010-08-03 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-09 16:30 ` [PATCH] Make div64_u64() " Brian Behlendorf
2010-09-17 0:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101014121159.GA407@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=behlendorf1@llnl.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox