From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
agruen@suse.de, jengelh@medozas.de, davem@davemloft.net,
andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: Process to push changes to include/linux/types.h
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:54:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101014125458.9e51ac58.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287084892.3367.18.camel@dhcp231-212.rdu.redhat.com>
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:34:52 -0400
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote:
> A patch was posted a bit ago by agruen which made a change to
> include/linux/types.h changing aligned_u64 to __aligned_u64 and exposing
> this new type to userspace.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128316627912457&w=2
>
> Everyone seemed to agree the patch was a good idea and was correct. At
> the moment this change only really affects network code, but I would
> very much like to make use of this change in the notification tree.
> Dave Miller did not apply the patch because "Someone has to first add
> the types to linux/types.h, and that doesn't go through my tree."
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128634544524035&w=2
>
> I'm a little stuck as to the right path forward. I normally would have
> had no qualms about adding __aligned_u64 to types.h in the notification
> tree and pushing it to Linus next go-round and then the net tree could
> convert and potentially drop the old aligned_u64 type (but again that
> would be outside the net tree). Since Dave isn't willing to add the
> type and I don't want to get called too many bad names, I figured I
> should try to find if there is some better way, maintainer, or tree who
> should be adding this new type.
>
> Who needs to sign off on a new type in types.h? Who should add it?
> Should I just ram it on in there myself, take any flames that come
> along, and then let net finish their cleanups after I've been charred?
> Any suggestions on the best course of action would be appreciated.
>
The usual approach here is someone sends it to me and I send it to
Linus ;)
If the change is simple, obviously safe and is needed in two or more
subsystem trees then I'll usually sneak it into mainline late in -rc,
simply to make everyone's life easier. Of course, you could both agree
to merge the same patch into local trees and I assume that git will
sort it all out.
For this particular patch I'd suggest it be split into two: one adds
the new __aligned_u64 and friends. The second patch kills off
aligned_u64 and friends. I'd say the first four-liner would then be
safe for immediate merge and the cleanup patch can go in any old time.
Regarding the patch itself: it uses open-coded
__attribute__((aligned(...))), however we have the __aligned(...)
helpers in compiler.h.
I'm always a bit ambivalent about those helpers (__packed, etc).
They're not a very kernely thing to do, but the gcc __attribute__
syntax really is a mouthful.
And adding a compiler.h dependency to the shared-with-userspace types.h
may not be practical or safe, dunno.
So if this works, I'd suggest preparing the simple four-liner with the
intention of an immediate merge.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-14 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-14 19:34 Process to push changes to include/linux/types.h Eric Paris
2010-10-14 19:45 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-14 19:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-10-14 21:26 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-14 21:35 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-14 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-14 21:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-10-14 21:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-14 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-14 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-14 23:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-15 3:03 ` Abbrevieated SHA1s (Was: Re: Process to push changes to include/linux/types.h) Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-15 8:22 ` Process to push changes to include/linux/types.h Andi Kleen
2010-10-15 9:01 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-15 10:15 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-10-15 14:26 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-15 14:44 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-10-15 15:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-15 10:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101014125458.9e51ac58.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox