public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] [PATCH -next] xfs: eliminate kconfig dependency warning
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:55:02 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101014205502.GC4681@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB73B5B.30108@oracle.com>

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:18:19AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/14/10 02:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:01:42PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> >>
> >> Fix kconfig dependency warning to satisfy dependencies:
> >>
> >> warning: (XFS_FS && BLOCK || NFSD && NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS && INET && FILE_LOCKING && BKL) selects EXPORTFS which has unmet direct dependencies (NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS)
> > 
> > I'm not entirely sure what this gibberish means, but I'm pretty sure it
> > does not make sense.
> > 
> > EXPORTFS is a small module that doesn't have any dependencie, and it's
> > needed by XFS for the by-handle operation, and by nfsd for the same
> > thing.  It has absolutely nothing to do with networking or network
> > filesystems (as in network filesystem clients).
> 
> The (kconfig) warning/problem is that exportfs is in the Networking Filesystems menu,
> under the kconfig symbol NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS.

Thanks for the explanation, Randy.

> Dave Chinner wrote:
> | EXPORTFS functionality actually has use for local filesystems - the
> | open-by-handle interfaces in XFS are what uses it, and there are patches
> | about that make this generic for most filesystems. Hence it seems to
> | me that the correct thing to do is separate EXPORTFS from
> | NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS, not make local filesystems depend on a user
> | selecting network filesystem support....
> 
> Agreed.  Is that Kconfig change also part of the "patches about"?

I can't remember exactly what it does with the kconfig symbols.
Information about the patch series (including a link to the git repo
storing the changes) is here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=128627415827161&w=2

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-14 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-14  4:01 [PATCH -next] xfs: eliminate kconfig dependency warning Randy Dunlap
2010-10-14  4:48 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-14  9:25 ` [xfs-masters] " Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-14 15:44   ` Randy Dunlap
2010-10-14 17:18   ` Randy Dunlap
2010-10-14 20:55     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-10-14 21:03       ` Randy Dunlap
2010-10-14 22:32     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101014205502.GC4681@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox