public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pjt@google.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Bourdon <pbourdon@excellency.fr>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 05/12] sched: fix update_cfs_load synchronization
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:43:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101016045118.832209343@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101016044349.830426011@google.com

[-- Attachment #1: sched-tg-fix-update_cfs_load.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4089 bytes --]

Using cfs_rq->nr_running is not sufficient to synchronize update_cfs_load with
the put path since nr_running accounting occurs at deactivation.

It's also not safe to make the removal decision based on load_avg as this fails
with both high periods and low shares.  Resolve this by clipping history at 8
foldings.

Note: the above will always occur from update_shares() since in the 
last-task-sleep-case that task will still be cfs_rq->curr when update_cfs_load is 
called.

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>

---
 kernel/sched.c      |    2 +-
 kernel/sched_fair.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- kernel/sched_fair.c.orig
+++ kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -674,10 +674,11 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cf
 }
 
 #if defined CONFIG_SMP && defined CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
+static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	u64 period = sched_avg_period();
 	u64 now, delta;
+	unsigned long load = cfs_rq->load.weight;
 
 	if (!cfs_rq)
 		return;
@@ -685,9 +686,19 @@ static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_r
 	now = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock;
 	delta = now - cfs_rq->load_stamp;
 
+	/* truncate load history at 4 idle periods */
+	if (cfs_rq->load_stamp > cfs_rq->load_last &&
+	    now - cfs_rq->load_last > 4 * period) {
+		cfs_rq->load_period = 0;
+		cfs_rq->load_avg = 0;
+	}
+
 	cfs_rq->load_stamp = now;
 	cfs_rq->load_period += delta;
-	cfs_rq->load_avg += delta * cfs_rq->load.weight;
+	if (load) {
+		cfs_rq->load_last = now;
+		cfs_rq->load_avg += delta * load;
+	}
 
 	while (cfs_rq->load_period > period) {
 		/*
@@ -700,10 +711,8 @@ static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_r
 		cfs_rq->load_avg /= 2;
 	}
 
-	if (lb && !cfs_rq->nr_running) {
-		if (cfs_rq->load_avg < (period / 8))
-			list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
-	}
+	if (!cfs_rq->curr && !cfs_rq->nr_running && !cfs_rq->load_avg)
+		list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
 }
 
 static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
@@ -750,7 +759,7 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs
 	reweight_entity(cfs_rq_of(se), se, shares);
 }
 #else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
-static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
+static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 }
 
@@ -880,7 +889,7 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
 	 * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
 	 */
 	update_curr(cfs_rq);
-	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
+	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
 	update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq_of(se), se->load.weight);
 	account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
 
@@ -941,7 +950,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
 	if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
 		__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 	se->on_rq = 0;
-	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
+	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
 	account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
 	update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
 	update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq_of(se), 0);
@@ -1176,7 +1185,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct 
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 
-		update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
+		update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
 		update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
 	}
 
@@ -1206,7 +1215,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq 
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 
-		update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
+		update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
 		update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
 	}
 
@@ -2019,7 +2028,7 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_grou
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
 
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
-	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 1);
+	update_cfs_load(cfs_rq);
 
 	load_avg = div64_u64(cfs_rq->load_avg, cfs_rq->load_period+1);
 	load_avg -= cfs_rq->load_contribution;
Index: kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- kernel/sched.c.orig
+++ kernel/sched.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
 
 	u64 load_avg;
 	u64 load_period;
-	u64 load_stamp;
+	u64 load_stamp, load_last;
 
 	unsigned long load_contribution;
 #endif

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-16  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-16  4:43 [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 00/12] [RFC tg_shares_up - v1 00/12] Reducing cost of tg->shares distribution pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 01/12] sched: rewrite tg_shares_up pjt
2010-10-21  6:04   ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-21  6:28     ` Paul Turner
2010-10-21  8:08   ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-21  8:38     ` Paul Turner
2010-10-21  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTi=zYAfb_izD15ROxH=C6+zPzX+XEGw7r5UUoAar@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-04 21:00     ` Paul Turner
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 02/12] sched: on-demand (active) cfs_rq list pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 03/12] sched: make tg_shares_up() walk on-demand pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 04/12] sched: fix load corruption from update_cfs_shares pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` pjt [this message]
2010-10-21  9:52   ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 05/12] sched: fix update_cfs_load synchronization Bharata B Rao
2010-10-21 18:25     ` Paul Turner
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 06/12] sched: hierarchal order on shares update list pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 07/12] sched: add sysctl_sched_shares_window pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 08/12] sched: update shares on idle_balance pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 09/12] sched: demand based update_cfs_load() pjt
2010-10-16  4:43 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 10/12] sched: allow update_cfs_load to update global load pjt
2010-10-16  4:44 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 11/12] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write pjt
2010-10-16  4:44 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 12/12] debug: export effective shares for analysis versus specified pjt
2010-10-16 19:46 ` [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 00/12] [RFC tg_shares_up - v1 00/12] Reducing cost of tg->shares distribution Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-21  6:36   ` Paul Turner
2010-10-22  0:14     ` Paul Turner
2010-10-17  5:24 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-17  9:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17 12:09     ` Balbir Singh
2010-11-03 18:27 ` Karl Rister

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101016045118.832209343@google.com \
    --to=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pbourdon@excellency.fr \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox