From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arch generic way to trigger unknown NMIs
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:58:28 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101017085828.GA7925@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010170055260.15889@eddie.linux-mips.org>
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59:11AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Maciej, the send_IPI_self could be modified to send NMI (at moment it
> > > > uses self shortcut with fixed delivery mode). The question is rather if
> > > > we need it without a real caller yet. When Don's patch gets merged we
> > > > will have a real caller then and could update send_IPI_self to support
> > > > NMI delivery mode. Something like that :)
> > >
> > > Sounds backwards to me. My understanding is a need has just arisen, so
> > > why not:
> > >
> > > 1. Update send_IPI_self().
> > >
> > > 2. Add code that makes use of the new functionality.
> > >
> > > 3. Submit all the changes as self-contained patches in a single series to
> > > be applied at the same time.
> > >
> > > ? That's what I'd imagine the most natural way of doing this would be.
> >
> > Well, Maciej I believe the problem is not in modifying send_IPI_self
> > but rather _how_ to make it more natural and do not introduce overhead.
> > apic code is already weird enough :) Need to think.
> >
> > (
> > btw, we will have to add additional flag which would check for NMI
> > being generated by "NMI-tester" and make a second apic write to
> > ICR to deassert level line, ie it could be something like
> >
> > apic->send_IPI_self(NMI_VECTOR) ; with asserts level
> > default_do_nmi() ; check for NMI being sent for testing purpose
> > apic->send_IPI_self(NMI_VECTOR) ; with deasserts level
> >
> > iirc apic itself doesn't deassert nmi line on message with
> > nmi deliver mode arrival
> > )
>
> How different is it to the other two send_IPI shorthand calls? Or the
> fully-fledged one? I gather from this thread they already handle NMIs
> properly, so what is there within that cannot simply be copied over to
> this one?
>
> Maciej
>
Hmm, good question ;) I thought about 82489dx which required level
trigger mode for nmi delivery, new (or present day) apics always
use edge trigger mode so indeed there is no need for level assert/deassert.
Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-17 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 3:08 [RFC] arch generic way to trigger unknown NMIs Don Zickus
2010-10-07 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-07 14:01 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-07 15:11 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-07 15:47 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-07 16:17 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-07 22:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-10-10 20:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-16 7:24 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-10-16 15:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-16 16:15 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-10-16 16:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-16 23:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-10-17 8:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-10-17 16:08 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101017085828.GA7925@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox