From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755667Ab0JRNfL (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:35:11 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:60179 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754275Ab0JRNfJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:35:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:35:08 -0500 From: Robin Holt To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Patch] Incoming XPC channel messages can come in after the channel's partition structures have been torn down. Message-ID: <20101018133508.GC14064@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Under some workloads, some channel messages have been observed being delayed on the sending side past the point where the receiving side has been able to tear down its partition structures. This condition is already detected in xpc_handle_activate_IRQ_uv(), but that information is not given to xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(). As a result, xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv() assumes the structures still exist and references them. Signed-off-by: Robin Holt --- drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c index 1f59ee2..17bbacb 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_uv.c @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ xpc_process_activate_IRQ_rcvd_uv(void) static void xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part, struct xpc_activate_mq_msghdr_uv *msg_hdr, + int part_setup, int *wakeup_hb_checker) { unsigned long irq_flags; @@ -481,6 +482,9 @@ xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part, case XPC_ACTIVATE_MQ_MSG_CHCTL_CLOSEREQUEST_UV: { struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_closerequest_uv *msg; + if (!part_setup) + break; + msg = container_of(msg_hdr, struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_closerequest_uv, hdr); @@ -497,6 +501,9 @@ xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part, case XPC_ACTIVATE_MQ_MSG_CHCTL_CLOSEREPLY_UV: { struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_closereply_uv *msg; + if (!part_setup) + break; + msg = container_of(msg_hdr, struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_closereply_uv, hdr); @@ -511,6 +518,9 @@ xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part, case XPC_ACTIVATE_MQ_MSG_CHCTL_OPENREQUEST_UV: { struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_openrequest_uv *msg; + if (!part_setup) + break; + msg = container_of(msg_hdr, struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_openrequest_uv, hdr); @@ -528,6 +538,9 @@ xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part, case XPC_ACTIVATE_MQ_MSG_CHCTL_OPENREPLY_UV: { struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_openreply_uv *msg; + if (!part_setup) + break; + msg = container_of(msg_hdr, struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_openreply_uv, hdr); args = &part->remote_openclose_args[msg->ch_number]; @@ -545,6 +558,9 @@ xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(struct xpc_partition *part, case XPC_ACTIVATE_MQ_MSG_CHCTL_OPENCOMPLETE_UV: { struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_opencomplete_uv *msg; + if (!part_setup) + break; + msg = container_of(msg_hdr, struct xpc_activate_mq_msg_chctl_opencomplete_uv, hdr); spin_lock_irqsave(&part->chctl_lock, irq_flags); @@ -621,6 +637,7 @@ xpc_handle_activate_IRQ_uv(int irq, void *dev_id) part_referenced = xpc_part_ref(part); xpc_handle_activate_mq_msg_uv(part, msg_hdr, + part_referenced, &wakeup_hb_checker); if (part_referenced) xpc_part_deref(part);