From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Brian Gitonga Marete <marete@toshnix.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PERF] (Userspace Tools) Fix a compilation error with -fstack-protector and -Werror
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:11:52 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019131152.GB3826@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019114904.GB25371@elte.hu>
Em Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 01:49:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
>
> * Brian Gitonga Marete <marete@toshnix.com> wrote:
>
> > > OK. Now that I actually look closely at that fragment I can see its useless to
> > > create the automatic arrays. Local string literals would also work (i.e. just
> > > pass `"Yes"' and `"No"' to newtWinChoice). But can also do what you suggested if
> > > it is anticipated that they will be used somewhere else within the file at some
> > > other time -- Currently they are not.
> >
> > Oops. Sorry. What I suggested won't work because of the -Wwrite-strings default
> > option. Which actually makes me understand why the original author of the code
> > made it the way it is. Your suggestion of file-scope, static does solve the
> > problem.
>
> Btw., -Wwrite-strings has proven to be a really useful warning in practice, in that
> it ensured that we propagate string immutability/const-ness as widely as possible.
> This resulted is cleaner perf code in the long run.
>
> Here we cannot fix the Newt prototype (it's an existing library outside of our
> control) to take a const so we have to do the (mild) workaround of moving it to file
> scope. (if this becomes common then we'd have to re-evaluate the use of this
> warning)
>
> I think Arnaldo has plans to get rid of the libnewt dependency altogether - that
> might be a fix too.
Yeah, but for now I'll just reap the results of this long discussion
about this issue. :)
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-18 23:24 [PATCH] [PERF] (Userspace Tools) Fix a compilation error with -fstack-protector and -Werror Brian Gitonga Marete
2010-10-18 23:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-19 0:06 ` Brian Gitonga Marete
2010-10-19 0:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-19 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-19 9:03 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-19 11:12 ` Brian Gitonga Marete
2010-10-19 11:33 ` Brian Gitonga Marete
2010-10-19 11:37 ` Brian Gitonga Marete
2010-10-19 11:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-19 13:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2010-10-24 21:23 ` [PATCH] Fix a compile error with -fstack-protector, -Wstack-protector " Brian Gitonga Marete
2010-11-11 10:25 ` [PATCH] [PERF] (Userspace Tools) Fix a compilation error with -fstack-protector " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 17:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-11-11 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101019131152.GB3826@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marete@toshnix.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox