public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Jeremy@acsinet12.oracle.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] xen: remap GSIs as pirqs when running as initial domain
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:48:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019154840.GA8066@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010191116480.2423@kaball-desktop>

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:41:36AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:42:42PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> > > 
> > > Implement xen_register_gsi to setup the correct triggering and polarity
> > > properties of a gsi.
> > > Implement xen_register_pirq to register a particular gsi as pirq and
> > > receive interrupts as events.
> > > Call xen_setup_pirqs to register all the legacy ISA irqs as pirqs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/xen/pci.h  |    7 ++
> > >  arch/x86/pci/xen.c              |  132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/xen/events.c            |   13 ++++
> > >  include/xen/interface/physdev.h |   10 +++
> > >  4 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/pci.h
> > > index f89a42a..2329b3e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/pci.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/pci.h
> > > @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ static inline int pci_xen_hvm_init(void)
> > >  	return -1;
> > >  }
> > >  #endif
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_XEN_DOM0)
> > > +void __init xen_setup_pirqs(void);
> > > +#else
> > > +static inline void __init xen_setup_pirqs(void)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > >  
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_PCI_XEN)
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> > > index fb20d05..5d87774 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> > > @@ -262,3 +262,135 @@ int __init pci_xen_hvm_init(void)
> > >  #endif
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0
> > > +static int xen_register_pirq(u32 gsi, int triggering)
> > > +{
> > > +	int rc, irq;
> > > +	struct physdev_map_pirq map_irq;
> > > +	int shareable = 0;
> > > +	char *name;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!xen_pv_domain())
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +
> > > +	if (triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE) {
> > > +		shareable = 0;
> > > +		name = "ioapic-edge";
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		shareable = 1;
> > > +		name = "ioapic-level";
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	irq = xen_allocate_pirq(gsi, shareable, name);
> > > +
> > > +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: --> irq=%d\n", irq);
> > > +
> > > +	if (irq < 0)
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +
> > > +	map_irq.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > > +	map_irq.type = MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_GSI;
> > > +	map_irq.index = gsi;
> > > +	map_irq.pirq = irq;
> > > +
> > > +	rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq, &map_irq);
> > > +	if (rc) {
> > > +		printk(KERN_WARNING "xen map irq failed %d\n", rc);
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +out:
> > > +	return irq;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int xen_register_gsi(u32 gsi, int triggering, int polarity)
> > > +{
> > > +	int rc, irq;
> > > +	struct physdev_setup_gsi setup_gsi;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!xen_pv_domain())
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +
> > > +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: registering gsi %u triggering %d polarity %d\n",
> > > +			gsi, triggering, polarity);
> > > +
> > > +	irq = xen_register_pirq(gsi, triggering);
> > > +
> > > +	setup_gsi.gsi = gsi;
> > > +	setup_gsi.triggering = (triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1);
> > > +	setup_gsi.polarity = (polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
> > > +
> > > +	rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi, &setup_gsi);
> > > +	if (rc == -EEXIST)
> > > +		printk(KERN_INFO "Already setup the GSI :%d\n", gsi);
> > > +	else if (rc) {
> > > +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to setup GSI :%d, err_code:%d\n",
> > > +				gsi, rc);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return irq;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	int rc;
> > > +	int trigger, polarity;
> > > +	int gsi = acpi_sci_override_gsi;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!gsi)
> > > +		return;
> > 
> > Should this be 'if (gsi >= 0)' ? I haven't seen any machine
> > with the GSI at IRQ 0, but perhaps it would be possible?
> > 
> 
> The test is correct as it is because it is meant to check if the
> acpi_sci_override_gsi has been set correctly and by default is 0.
> A similar test is done in
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:acpi_parse_madt_ioapic_entries.

ok.
> 
> 
> > > +
> > > +	rc = acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &trigger, &polarity);
> > > +	if (rc)
> > > +		return;
> > 
> > We don't want to report the error? Say a printk?
> > 
> 
> good idea, I'll add one.

Thank you.
> 
> > > +	trigger = trigger ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
> > > +	polarity = polarity ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> > > +	
> > > +	printk("xen: sci override: global_irq=%d trigger=%d polarity=%d\n",
> > > +			gsi, trigger, polarity);
> > > +
> > > +	gsi = xen_register_gsi(gsi, trigger, polarity);
> > > +	printk("xen: acpi sci %d\n", gsi);
> > 
> > KERN_INFO ?
> 
> ok

Danke.
> 
> > > +
> > > +	return;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int acpi_register_gsi_xen(struct device *dev, u32 gsi,
> > > +				 int trigger, int polarity)
> > > +{
> > > +	return xen_register_gsi(gsi, trigger, polarity);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	xen_setup_acpi_sci();
> > > +	__acpi_register_gsi = acpi_register_gsi_xen;
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void __init xen_setup_pirqs(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	int irq;
> > > +
> > > +	pci_xen_initial_domain();
> > > +
> > > +	if (0 == nr_ioapics) {
> > 
> > This function is only called for the Dom0 case, so under
> > what conditions would we have a machine with zero IO APICs?
> > 
> > And do we actually support machines with no IO APICs?
> > (would Xen run under such ancient hardware?)
>  
> I don't know about real hardware but during the development of the PV on
> HVM series I was able to boot a PV on HVM guest using the nr_ioapics==0
> code path successfully several times.
> And you never know what the future may bring :)

True.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-19 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-12 16:41 [PATCH v3 00/10] xen: initial domain support Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] xen: introduce XEN_DOM0 as a silent option Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] xen: remap GSIs as pirqs when running as initial domain Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-18 15:41   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-19 10:41     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-19 15:48       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] xen: remap MSIs into " Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-18 15:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-19 10:43     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] xen: map a dummy page for local apic and ioapic in xen_set_fixmap Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] xen: use vcpu_ops to setup cpu masks Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] xen: Initialize xenbus for dom0 Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] xen: add the direct mapping area for ISA bus access Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] xen: use host E820 map for dom0 Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-18 15:54   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-19 10:49     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-20 17:05       ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] xen: make hvc_xen console work " Stefano Stabellini
2010-10-12 16:42 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] xen: mask the MTRR feature from the cpuid Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101019154840.GA8066@dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=Jeremy@acsinet12.oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox