linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"ying.huang@intel.com" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86, NMI: Allow NMI reason io port (0x61) to be processed on any CPU
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:25:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019162507.GU5969@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019150701.GR5969@erda.amd.com>

On 19.10.10 17:07:01, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 15.10.10 22:22:17, Don Zickus wrote:
> > From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> > 
> > In original NMI handler, NMI reason io port (0x61) is only processed
> > on BSP. This makes it impossible to hot-remove BSP. To solve the
> > issue, a raw spinlock is used to make the port can be processed on any
> > CPU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

> > @@ -400,28 +405,28 @@ static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	/* Non-CPU-specific NMI: NMI sources can be processed on any CPU */
> > -	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > -	/* Only the BSP gets external NMIs from the system. */
> > -	if (!cpu) {
> > -		reason = get_nmi_reason();
> > -		if (reason & NMI_REASON_MASK) {
> > -			if (notify_die(DIE_NMI, "nmi", regs, reason, 2, SIGINT)
> > -			    == NOTIFY_STOP)
> > -				return;
> > -			if (reason & NMI_REASON_SERR)
> > -				pci_serr_error(reason, regs);
> > -			else if (reason & NMI_REASON_IOCHK)
> > -				io_check_error(reason, regs);
> > +	raw_spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock);
> 
> What about using raw_spin_trylock() instead? We don't have to wait
> here since we are already processing it by another cpu.

This would avoid a global lock and also deadlocking in case of a
potential #gp in the nmi handler.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-19 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-16  2:22 [PATCH 0/5] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift Don Zickus
2010-10-16  2:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86, NMI: Add NMI symbol constants and rename memory parity to PCI SERR Don Zickus
2010-10-16 16:36   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Huang Ying
2010-10-16  2:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86, NMI: Add touch_nmi_watchdog to io_check_error delay Don Zickus
2010-10-16 16:36   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Huang Ying
2010-10-16  2:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86, NMI: Rewrite NMI handler Don Zickus
2010-10-16 16:36   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Huang Ying
2010-10-16 17:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-16 18:20       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-16 18:40         ` Anca Emanuel
2010-10-17  0:46       ` Don Zickus
2010-10-17 10:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18  3:06           ` Huang Ying
2010-10-18  8:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-16  2:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86, NMI: Allow NMI reason io port (0x61) to be processed on any CPU Don Zickus
2010-10-16 16:37   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Huang Ying
2010-10-19 15:07   ` [PATCH 4/5] " Robert Richter
2010-10-19 16:25     ` Robert Richter [this message]
2010-10-19 18:37       ` Don Zickus
2010-10-20  0:23         ` Huang Ying
2010-10-20 10:03           ` Robert Richter
2010-10-21  0:46             ` Huang Ying
2010-10-20 14:27           ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21  0:40             ` Huang Ying
2010-10-21  1:18               ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21  1:25                 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-21  2:37                   ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21  2:53                     ` Huang Ying
2010-10-16  2:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, NMI: Remove do_nmi_callback logic Don Zickus
2010-10-16 16:37   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Huang Ying
2010-10-19 15:03   ` [PATCH 5/5] " Robert Richter
2010-10-19 16:01     ` Don Zickus
2010-10-19 16:23       ` Robert Richter
2010-10-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift Robert Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101019162507.GU5969@erda.amd.com \
    --to=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).