public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arthur Kepner <akepner@sgi.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHv2] x86/irq: round-robin distribution of irqs to cpus w/in node
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:58:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019235842.GH2440@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010171201410.2496@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:44:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> ....
> Looked a bit deeper into the users. Quite a bunch do
> 
>        pci_enable_msix();
>        request_irqs();
> 
> in their probe function. There is no sign of making them per cpu or
> node. mlx4 is one of them. No sign of anything related to nodes or cpus in
> the whole driver.
> 
> Even if the driver does not request the irqs from the probe function,
> why does it need to do the msi/msix setup in the probe function at
> all?
> 
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to do that at open() right before the
> interrupts are requested.

That's a good point.

> .....
> The fundamental flaw of arch_setup_msi_irqs() is 
> 
>   node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
> 
> That's the only node information we get. So we put everything on a
> single node.
>

But it's even worse than that, because we put everything on a single 
cpu within the node until no vectors are left there, then move on to the 
next one...

-- 
Arthur

      reply	other threads:[~2010-10-19 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-27 20:34 [RFC/PATCHv2] x86/irq: round-robin distribution of irqs to cpus w/in node Arthur Kepner
2010-09-27 20:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-27 22:01   ` Arthur Kepner
2010-09-27 22:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-28  0:17       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-09-28  8:08         ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-28 10:59           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-09-29 17:19             ` Arthur Kepner
2010-09-29 18:05               ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-17 10:44             ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-19 23:58               ` Arthur Kepner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101019235842.GH2440@sgi.com \
    --to=akepner@sgi.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox