From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758120Ab0JTDyi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:54:38 -0400 Received: from imr3.ericy.com ([198.24.6.13]:45999 "EHLO imr3.ericy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756877Ab0JTDyh (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:54:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:53:46 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Joe Perches CC: Jean Delvare , Hans de Goede , Alistair John Strachan , Henrik Rydberg , "Mark M. Hoffman" , Luca Tettamanti , Fenghua Yu , Juerg Haefliger , Eric Piel , Jim Cromie , Roger Lucas , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_ Message-ID: <20101020035346.GA20178@ericsson.com> References: <1287530020.10409.594.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101020032938.GA20095@ericsson.com> <1287545658.10409.606.camel@Joe-Laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1287545658.10409.606.camel@Joe-Laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:34:18PM -0400, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 20:29 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 07:13:40PM -0400, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Convert printks to pr_ > > > Coalesce long formats > > > Removed prefixes from formats > > > Added #define pr_fmt KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt > > > Standardized abitguru messages for reporting and finding MAINTAINER > > > Compiled x86 allyesconfig only. > > > I inspected "strings drivers/hwmon/built-in.o", > > > but it's otherwise untested. > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > > There are several lines longer than 80 characters. > > Does this rule no longer apply ? > > 80 columns isn't checked for printk format strings. > Interesting. > A kernel general preference may be to keep formats as > a single string without line breaks so that grep works > better. > > > Oddly enough, there are only four checkpatch warnings about long lines, > > even though there are many more. > > The version I use doesn't show any warnings. > checkpatch.pl from both v2.6.36-rc7 and v2.6.36-rc6 do report warnings. Looks like those versions flag long lines for pr_warn. Is your version older or newer ? Anyway, would it be possible to split the patch into one patch per file ? I don't know how Jean thinks about it, but in my opinion it would be cleaner, permit revert on a single patch/file instead of having to revert the entire series, it would simplify review, and it would make it much easier to cherry-pick pieces into other releases if needed. Thanks, Guenter