From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754364Ab0JTQpf (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:45:35 -0400 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:34723 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754300Ab0JTQpd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:45:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:45:15 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Joe Perches Cc: Guenter Roeck , Hans de Goede , Alistair John Strachan , Henrik Rydberg , "Mark M. Hoffman" , Luca Tettamanti , Fenghua Yu , Juerg Haefliger , Eric Piel , Jim Cromie , Roger Lucas , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_ Message-ID: <20101020184515.38512719@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <1287590890.1813.166.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1287530020.10409.594.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101020032938.GA20095@ericsson.com> <1287545658.10409.606.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101020035346.GA20178@ericsson.com> <1287547662.10409.618.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20101020093438.07b129c8@endymion.delvare> <20101020144608.GA21937@ericsson.com> <1287590890.1813.166.camel@Joe-Laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Joe, On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:08:10 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 07:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > * That being said, now that the hwmon subsystem maintainer is a shared > > > duty between Guenter and myself, there's no single place where we can > > > keep a patch touching many drivers and ensure it doesn't conflict > > > with the changes in the other tree. But I would think this is > > > something for Gunter and myself to sort out, not patch contributors. > > Perhaps allow both maintainers read/write access to hwmon-next? Guenter and myself are collaborating on the hwmon tree since a relatively recent date. We still have to find the best method. For now we have separate trees because it seemed easier that way, but we may change our minds later. > > > I currently have pending patches to the following hwmon drivers in my > > > tree: adt7475, ams, asc7621, hdaps, it87, k8temp, lm75, lm85, lm90, > > > pcf8591, s3c-hwmon, w83795. Two of these are affected by Joe's > > > patch(es). Guenter, what about you? > > > > coretemp, pkgtemp, via-cputemp, ltc4261 (new), lis3, hp_accel > > I did these against next which includes 'hwmon-staging/hwmon-next'. > > Shouldn't these patches apply without modification or do I need > to do something else? If you based your patches on linux-next then you're all set. I was asking Guenter about his affected drivers only to decide who, of him and me, should take which patch. -- Jean Delvare