?Powermanagement?-Regression in 2.6.36

?Powermanagement?-Regression in 2.6.36

[Christian Bahls]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 934 bytes --]

Dear List

i have a netbook samsung n510 @nynet
 using an 80GB Intel SSD as a system drive

starting in the 2.6.36-cycle (i usually try a few -rcs)
i got trouble booting my computer
.. it stalls at either initializing the sata-drive or at mount-time
 .. quite interestingly these stalls can be fixed by pressing the power button

attached are two dmesgs
 one is from vanilla 2.6.36
 the other from debian unstable's 2.6.32-5

i am not subscribed to lkml
 so any communication directed to me
  has to explicitly include me in the recipient list

yours
 Christian Bahls

PS: i skipped the 2.6.35-rc-cycle so the regression could be older
PPS: bisecting this regression seems to be out of question
 recompiling the kernel on this computer takes a few hours
 as all the other computers i use are 64bit
 i would alternatively have to setup a cross-compilation environment
 which i have not done in years (and not without rocklinux either)

[-- Attachment #2: regression.in.2.6.36.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 12894 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: dmesg.in.2.6.32.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 8865 bytes --]

Re: ?Powermanagement?-Regression in 2.6.36

[Matthias Schniedermeyer]

On 21.10.2010 16:34, Christian Bahls wrote:
> Dear List
> 
> PPS: bisecting this regression seems to be out of question
>  recompiling the kernel on this computer takes a few hours
>  as all the other computers i use are 64bit
>  i would alternatively have to setup a cross-compilation environment
>  which i have not done in years (and not without rocklinux either)

As far as it is my experience, x86 32bit/64bit can build each other.

On the "big" machine just add "ARCH=x86" to (all!) make invocations.
ARCH=x86 makes "CONFIG_64BIT" an actual configuration option and 
honours whatever is configured in the .config-file.





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.