From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760235Ab0JZRxL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:53:11 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:34537 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755360Ab0JZRxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:53:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:52:56 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Charles Edward Lever , Zimny Lech , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 6 Message-ID: <20101026175256.GA12141@elte.hu> References: <20101006163632.c1943a38.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101026080822.GA10520@elte.hu> <1288096333.3123.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20101026124113.GA10872@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101026124113.GA10872@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > Anyhow, does the following fix the bug? > > Thanks, trying it. It has done the trick. Tested-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo