From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753976Ab0J0HVk (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:21:40 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:58475 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183Ab0J0HVj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:21:39 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:21:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36+; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Bryan Schumaker , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20101026164549.GD19445@fieldses.org> <20101026214441.GC1842@fieldses.org> <20101026221156.GD1842@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20101026221156.GD1842@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010270921.37032.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:AQd6TgPpwcwY99mQzLiY9XJ7xDycmKu+7RRN/ViMQMV nt2hIpTTj97N1TU+gqeHdUEWhTuB5JtDsTVj6plsw4MM0iHLyz MiDP523T3qvpgjLzYU0mrLCx9BlmfIpfqX51CqyAqX4e6gGDtu yC4YYzwBCyerzSk5ipRtYHs9GLmf5+2aFC8QFRKFnNvJttmbeK V1vVvlxsHfMqceZ2LF0KQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 27 October 2010 00:11:56 J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:3101 > > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 4345, name: lease_tests > > 1 lock held by lease_tests/4345: > > #0: (file_lock_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] lock_flocks+0x15/0x20 > > Pid: 4345, comm: lease_tests Not tainted 2.6.36-05858-gbd5e20b #1028 > > Call Trace: > > [] __might_sleep+0x10d/0x140 > > [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1f3/0x230 > > [] generic_setlease+0x112/0x2c0 > > [] __vfs_setlease+0x35/0x40 > > [] fcntl_setlease+0xce/0x180 > > [] sys_fcntl+0x2fe/0x630 > > [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f > > [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > > > I'm testing a patch. > Thanks for the report! > @@ -1524,8 +1528,6 @@ int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, long arg) > if (error) > return error; > > - lock_flocks(); > - > error = __vfs_setlease(filp, arg, &flp); > if (error || arg == F_UNLCK) > goto out_unlock; > @@ -1541,7 +1543,6 @@ int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, long arg) > > error = __f_setown(filp, task_pid(current), PIDTYPE_PID, 0); > out_unlock: > - unlock_flocks(); > return error; > } If you don't hold lock_flocks throughout fcntl_setlease, the flp variable points to a flock that may get modified by another thread and you call time_out_leases() without holding lock_flocks, which it requires. The two alternatives I can see are to either use GFP_ATOMIC or to take the lock inside of generic_setlease and drop it outside. Neither of the two sounds particularly appealing. Arnd