public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fyi: gcc33-hammer crashes when compiling kvm emulate.c
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:00:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101027170023.GA22171@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC803DD.2010508@redhat.com>

> Would be good to have __fastpath and __slowpath function attributes.
> 
> __fastpath would always be optimized for speed, __slowpath always
> for size, and everything else would use the default (determined by
> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE).

> 
> Looks like gcc has support for this, with __attribute__((hot)),
> __attribute__((cold)), and __attribute__((optimize)).

I had patches for a long time, but last time I tried it didn't help too much.
(basically make __init hot/cold and mark a few functions) 
Similar things can be also done with unrolling. The Optimize attribute
is currently quite broken in gcc and shouldn't be used.

The main reason I didn't post them is that I didn't want another
likely/unlikely with people sprinkling them randomly and never
looking at profile logs. I am to blame for likely()/unlikely() originally
 and it got abused so much that I regretted it alot. So I don't
think just exposing that is a good idea right now.

I think there are some other ways to do that better, but they
will need more work.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

      reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-26 12:38 fyi: gcc33-hammer crashes when compiling kvm emulate.c Andi Kleen
2010-10-26 16:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-26 16:37   ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-26 16:46     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-26 17:01       ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-26 18:19         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-26 20:27           ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-26 20:37             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-27 10:50               ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-27 17:00                 ` Andi Kleen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101027170023.GA22171@basil.fritz.box \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox