From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:40:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101027174016.GA18974@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTXoGiFap-vfu0P_SXb5xS+gMsHOwQtN3Hra3r@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:12:06AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>
> >> Something like the attached (UNTESTED!) perhaps?
> >
> > Makes sense to me. Testing....
>
> So I found a buglet in the patch: the
>
> NOTE! It is very important that the FASYNC flag always
> match the state "is the filp on a fasync list".
>
> comment should be moved to be associated with "fasync_insert_entry()"
> rather than "fasync_add_entry()", since it's the insert-entry thing
> that does the actual FASYNC flag handling.
>
> But that incorrect comment placement shouldn't affect testing, obviously ;)
>
> Btw, who is going to collect these things assuming it passes testing?
> Arnd? You? I'll happily sign off on the fasync patch (with the comment
> movement) assuming it tests out ok, but there's all the other patches
> too that have been passed around. I really do want to get this into
> the merge window, because it would be a big shame if we couldn't
> effectively get rid of the BKL now just because of these kinds of
> smallish final details, so I'm just checking who wants to step up to
> the plate to collect it all together and make sure I have it?
Doesn't matter to me. What I've currently got (Arnd's patches with some
minor fixes from me, and your patch, all in a poorly changelogged
jumble) is in
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git TMP-BKL-TESTING
You wouldn't want to merge that as is, but it does seem to work.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-27 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-26 16:45 nfsd changes for 2.6.37 J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 17:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-26 17:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 20:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-26 20:35 ` Bryan Schumaker
2010-10-26 20:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-26 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-26 21:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-26 21:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 22:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26 22:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 7:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 13:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 14:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 15:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 15:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-27 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 16:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 17:40 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-10-27 18:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 19:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 20:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-27 20:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-27 20:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] locks: prevent ENOMEM on lease unlock J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] locks: fix leaks on setlease errors J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 11:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 17:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-01 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 18:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] locks: fix setlease methods to free passed-in lock J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd4: initialize delegation pointer to lease J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 2:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-31 3:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-30 21:40 ` nfsd changes for 2.6.37 Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 2:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-31 3:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] locks: let the caller free file_lock on ->setlease failure Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-03 20:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-04 1:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-04 1:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-06 19:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-06 19:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 16:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-31 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] locks: remove fl_copy_lock lock_manager operation Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-01 15:02 ` nfsd changes for 2.6.37 J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-06 19:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101027174016.GA18974@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox