From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] kdb: avoid on-stack cpumask, old-style accessors
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:30:34 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010272030.34310.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
That's quite a big stack already; I assume moving it to a static bitmap
is OK for this usage (a cpumask_var_t might require kmalloc, not sure
that's a good idea here).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
---
kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
--- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
@@ -2598,6 +2598,9 @@ static int kdb_summary(int argc, const c
return 0;
}
+/* Not sure when to initialize this, so make it a static bitmap. */
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(per_cpu_suppress, NR_CPUS);
+
/*
* kdb_per_cpu - This function implements the 'per_cpu' command.
*/
@@ -2605,7 +2608,7 @@ static int kdb_per_cpu(int argc, const c
{
char buf[256], fmtstr[64];
kdb_symtab_t symtab;
- cpumask_t suppress = CPU_MASK_NONE;
+ struct cpumask *suppress = to_cpumask(per_cpu_suppress);
int cpu, diag;
unsigned long addr, val, bytesperword = 0, whichcpu = ~0UL;
@@ -2649,7 +2652,7 @@ static int kdb_per_cpu(int argc, const c
#define KDB_PCU(cpu) 0
#endif
#endif
-
+ cpumask_clear(suppress);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
if (whichcpu != ~0UL && whichcpu != cpu)
continue;
@@ -2662,7 +2665,7 @@ static int kdb_per_cpu(int argc, const c
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (!val) {
- cpu_set(cpu, suppress);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, suppress);
continue;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -2671,17 +2674,16 @@ static int kdb_per_cpu(int argc, const c
bytesperword == KDB_WORD_SIZE,
1, bytesperword, 1, 1, 0);
}
- if (cpus_weight(suppress) == 0)
+ if (cpumask_weight(suppress) == 0)
return 0;
kdb_printf("Zero suppressed cpu(s):");
- for (cpu = first_cpu(suppress); cpu < num_possible_cpus();
- cpu = next_cpu(cpu, suppress)) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, suppress) {
kdb_printf(" %d", cpu);
- if (cpu == num_possible_cpus() - 1 ||
- next_cpu(cpu, suppress) != cpu + 1)
+ if (cpu == nr_cpu_ids - 1 ||
+ cpumask_next(cpu, suppress) != cpu + 1)
continue;
- while (cpu < num_possible_cpus() &&
- next_cpu(cpu, suppress) == cpu + 1)
+ while (cpu < nr_cpu_ids &&
+ cpumask_next(cpu, suppress) == cpu + 1)
++cpu;
kdb_printf("-%d", cpu);
}
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-27 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-27 10:00 Rusty Russell [this message]
2010-10-27 11:44 ` [PATCH] kdb: avoid on-stack cpumask, old-style accessors Jason Wessel
2010-10-29 9:48 ` Rusty Russell
2010-10-29 13:11 ` Jason Wessel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010272030.34310.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox