public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, brgerst@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:28:09 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101029202809.GB6130@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288377146.1988.0.camel@laptop>

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:32:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 06:43 +0000, tip-bot for Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > +       irqctx = page_address(alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
> > +                                              THREAD_FLAGS,
> > +                                              THREAD_ORDER)); 
> 
> Shouldn't we be checking for a NULL return from alloc_pages_node()
> before calling page_address() on it?
> --

 Something like below I guess, but probably we could try to allocate
on appropriate NUMA node first and if it fails -- via old alloc_pages
and if it fail in turn -- then we panic.

  Cyrill
---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c |   17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
=====================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
@@ -122,13 +122,16 @@ execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struc
 void __cpuinit irq_ctx_init(int cpu)
 {
 	union irq_ctx *irqctx;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	if (per_cpu(hardirq_ctx, cpu))
 		return;
 
-	irqctx = page_address(alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
-					       THREAD_FLAGS,
-					       THREAD_ORDER));
+	page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
+				THREAD_FLAGS, THREAD_ORDER);
+	BUG_ON(!page);
+
+	irqctx				= page_address(page);
 	irqctx->tinfo.task		= NULL;
 	irqctx->tinfo.exec_domain	= NULL;
 	irqctx->tinfo.cpu		= cpu;
@@ -137,9 +140,11 @@ void __cpuinit irq_ctx_init(int cpu)
 
 	per_cpu(hardirq_ctx, cpu) = irqctx;
 
-	irqctx = page_address(alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
-					       THREAD_FLAGS,
-					       THREAD_ORDER));
+	page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
+				THREAD_FLAGS, THREAD_ORDER);
+	BUG_ON(!page);
+
+	irqctx				= page_address(page);
 	irqctx->tinfo.task		= NULL;
 	irqctx->tinfo.exec_domain	= NULL;
 	irqctx->tinfo.cpu		= cpu;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-29 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22   ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27       ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45         ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49               ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                               ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                             ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45                                                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                           ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                           ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-10-29 20:53                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                     ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                     ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                     ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06           ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46             ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54             ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50       ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101029202809.GB6130@lenovo \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox