From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bind-mount vs second mount of the same blockdev?
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:23:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101103102352.GB19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD12DED.3010902@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:39:57PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/a
> mount --bind /mnt/a /mnt/b
>
> versus
>
> mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/a
> mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/b
[snip]
> What are the differences in behavour?
None. Both lead to the identical states.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-03 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-03 9:39 bind-mount vs second mount of the same blockdev? Michael Tokarev
2010-11-03 10:23 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101103102352.GB19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox