From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752022Ab0KDL0o (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:26:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49165 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728Ab0KDL0m (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:26:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:26:30 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Shirley Ma Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: vhost-net-next updates Message-ID: <20101104112630.GA28748@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I pushed out some optimization patches on vhost-net-next branch on my vhost tree (intended for 2.6.38). It would be helpful if people working on vhost-net optimizations base their work on that tree just to make sure comparisons are apples to apples. I might rebase this as I didn't send a pull request to Dave yet but I'll try not to. So far I have: 8b7347a vhost: get/put_user -> __get/__put_user dfe5ac5 vhost: copy_to_user -> __copy_to_user 64e1c80 vhost-net: batch use/unuse mm 533a19b vhost: put mm after thread stop 3fcedec drivers/vhost/vhost.c: delete double assignment Thanks! -- MST