From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753939Ab0KEKYx (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2010 06:24:53 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40987 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752705Ab0KEKYv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2010 06:24:51 -0400 From: Thomas Renninger Organization: SUSE Products GmbH To: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: Cleanup idle= internal variables by getting rid of idle_halt idle_nomwait Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:24:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.31.5-0.1-desktop; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, LKML References: <201011021441.09258.trenn@suse.de> <201011031706.15248.trenn@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <201011031706.15248.trenn@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011051124.49973.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Len, On Wednesday 03 November 2010 17:06:14 Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 07:33:54 Len Brown wrote: ... > > That function and all these idle workaround flags > > need to be re-whacked. > Whatabout this (compile tested (on x86_64/ia64)). > Adding lkml as this affects x86 core code. as this mostly affects intel_idle and acpi processor driver, can you apply this one to your acpi test branch if you are ok with it. Thanks, Thomas