Re: [PATCH 1/2] locks: let the caller free file_lock on ->setlease failure

Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-06T19:04:03Z

> A minor oversight from f7347ce4ee7c65415f84be915c018473e7076f31,
> "fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a
> spinlock": this cleanup-on-error was only needed to handle -ENOMEM. Now
> that we're preallocating it's unneeded.

Looks good to me, too.