From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: touch_nmi_watchdog should only touch local cpu not every one
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:28:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101108182804.GR4823@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101108180518.GA5375@nowhere>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:05:23PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:44:35AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > I ran into a scenario where while one cpu was stuck and should have panic'd
> > because of the NMI watchdog, it didn't. The reason was another cpu was spewing
> > stack dumps on to the console. Upon investigation, I noticed that when writing
> > to the console and also when dumping the stack, the watchdog is touched.
> >
> > This causes all the cpus to reset their NMI watchdog flags and the 'stuck' cpu
> > just spins forever.
> >
> > This change causes the semantics of touch_nmi_watchdog to be changed slightly.
> > Previously, I accidentally changed the semantics and we noticed there was a
> > codepath in which touch_nmi_watchdog could be touched from a preemtible area.
> > That caused a BUG() to happen when CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT was enabled. I believe
> > it was the acpi code.
> >
> > My attempt here re-introduces the change to have the touch_nmi_watchdog() code
> > only touch the local cpu instead of all of the cpus. But instead of using
> > __get_cpu_var(), I use the __raw_get_cpu_var() version.
> >
> > This avoids the preemption problem. However my reasoning wasn't because I was
> > trying to be lazy. Instead I rationalized it as, well if preemption is enabled
> > then interrupts should be enabled to and the NMI watchdog will have no reason
> > to trigger. So it won't matter if the wrong cpu is touched because the percpu
> > interrupt counters the NMI watchdog uses should still be incrementing.
> >
> > V2: remove touch_all_nmi_watchdog code
>
>
> Are you sure you did? :)
Hmm.. Odd. I remember making and committing the changes. But now I can't
find them.
Thanks for catching that! I'll send out a version 3.
Cheers,
Don
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 16:44 [PATCH v2] watchdog: touch_nmi_watchdog should only touch local cpu not every one Don Zickus
2010-11-08 18:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-08 18:28 ` Don Zickus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101108182804.GR4823@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox