From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tracing: do export trace_set_clr_event
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:44:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109014439.GA32721@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289226184.12418.4.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:23:04AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 09:14 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:02:14AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I like the trace=on parameter much better. If that is set we could
> > > enable the tracepoints of that module at load time. I really do not want
> > > to export the function that was proposed in that patch.
> >
> > Yes. Adding generic support in the module loader to turn on tracepoint
> > seems like the much better long term strategy. Even better if it allows
> > turning on individual points instead of all or nothing.
>
> I was thinking the same. How about this:
>
> trace=1 - all tracepoints in the module is enabled
> trace=0 - same as leaving it off
>
> trace=name - a specific tracepoint is enabled, using the simple globs
> that set_event allows.
>
> trace=name1,name2,name3 - for more than one tracepoint.
Yes, agreed. I thought that's the way to make a generate interface for
active trace event on module load.
I have some other ideas for this:
1. For make it be consistent with the Documentation/trace/events.txt, I
guess we should use:
trace=* - all tracepoints in the module is enabled
trace=NULL - same as leaving it off
2. How about make it be module specific? Since there is aready a global
boot option for this: trace_event=[event_list], which doesn't work if
the coresponding event doesn't exist. I think it's the module's task
to enable it's own event at load time. Take i915 module as example, if
user put something like following in the boot command line:
i915.trace=i915_reg_rw,i915_gem_object_create
then the i915 module will try to enable these two envent at the init
function.
so, how about the following pseudo-code which should be in trace_events.c:
void trace_enable_module_event(struct module *mod, const char *event_list)
{
for_each_token(token, event_list) {
for_each_event(event, mod->trace_events) {
if (strcmp(mod->name, token) == 0)
ftrace_set_clr_event(token, 1);
}
}
}
then, on the i915 side:
i915_init ()
{
....
....
if (event_list)
trace_enable_module_event(THIS_MODULE, i915_trace);
...
}
Comments?
Thanks,
--
Yuanhan Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 6:05 [PATCH] Tracing: do export trace_set_clr_event Yuanhan Liu
2010-11-08 9:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 10:14 ` Chris Wilson
2010-11-08 14:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-08 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-09 1:44 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2011-03-11 9:52 ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Export trace_set_clr_event() tip-bot for Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109014439.GA32721@localhost.localdomain \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox