From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757253Ab0KJWTT (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:19:19 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:55188 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757211Ab0KJWTS (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:19:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Q1kvvZw3yHAmni0h1DKpJoVL69kOsHdWBSTl4RoUEK7PJL1iHVYtHriiCejW901Vfe UuxF/SjVCVvhxmmJbFtR3t5u0Q5nask7xnaFOe3PoHb0Pjh+23l6hGLQI5051F0WWW9P lumBs7V62HVXbb8OeG/2zrwk6hbEOWmnQ2k2I= Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:19:13 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Luck, Tony" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mchehab@redhat.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: Tracing Requirements (was: [RFC/Requirements/Design] h/w error reporting) Message-ID: <20101110221911.GA5355@nowhere> References: <1289403019.2084.17.camel@laptop> <20101110174852.GB4001@elte.hu> <1289412329.12418.177.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1289413460.2084.27.camel@laptop> <20101110184105.GH22410@elte.hu> <1289415645.12418.180.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20101110191127.GA6190@nowhere> <20101110202316.GA32396@Krystal> <20101110213033.GA7682@nowhere> <1289426059.12418.209.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1289426059.12418.209.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:54:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 22:30 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > I wouldn't comment that, I'm not very experienced with the ring buffer > > Yeah, I discussed this with Mathieu. There's a pretty trivial fix for > this, but may require ABI breakage. If you have this patch ready that fixes my ring buffer inexperience, please send it right away. I might accomodate with the self-ABI breakage, depending on what it is...