public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited()
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:20:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101111042014.GE3134@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDA5E40.3080205@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:56:32PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 09:26 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Paul.
> > 
> > 
> > How about something like the following?  It's slightly bigger but I
> > think it's a bit easier to understand.  Thanks.
> 
> Hello, Paul, Tejun,
> 
> I think this approach is good and much better when several tasks
> call synchronize_sched_expedited() at the same time.

I am becoming more comfortable with it as well.  Tejun, what kind of
testing did you do?  Lai, could you please run it on your systems?

							Thanx, Paul

> Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> > index aa14a56..0069be5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -9342,7 +9342,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
> > 
> >  #else /* #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
> > 
> > -static atomic_t synchronize_sched_expedited_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > +static atomic_t sync_sched_expedited_token = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > +static atomic_t sync_sched_expedited_done = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > 
> >  static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
> >  {
> > @@ -9373,11 +9374,18 @@ static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
> >   */
> >  void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> >  {
> > -	int snap, trycount = 0;
> > +	int my_tok, tok, t, trycount = 0;
> > +
> > +	smp_mb();  /* ensure prior mod happens before getting token. */
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Get a token.  This is used to coordinate with other
> > +	 * concurrent syncers and consolidate multiple syncs.
> > +	 */
> > +	my_tok = tok = atomic_inc_return(&sync_sched_expedited_token);
> > 
> > -	smp_mb();  /* ensure prior mod happens before capturing snap. */
> > -	snap = atomic_read(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count) + 1;
> >  	get_online_cpus();
> > +
> >  	while (try_stop_cpus(cpu_online_mask,
> >  			     synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
> >  			     NULL) == -EAGAIN) {
> > @@ -9388,13 +9396,34 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> >  			synchronize_sched();
> >  			return;
> >  		}
> > -		if (atomic_read(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count) - snap > 0) {
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If the done count reached @my_tok, we know at least
> > +		 * one synchronization happened since we entered this
> > +		 * function.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (atomic_read(&sync_sched_expedited_done) - my_tok >= 0) {
> >  			smp_mb(); /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
> >  			return;
> >  		}
> > +
> >  		get_online_cpus();
> > +
> > +		/* about to retry, get the latest token value */
> > +		tok = atomic_read(&sync_sched_expedited_token);
> >  	}
> > -	atomic_inc(&synchronize_sched_expedited_count);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We now know that everything upto @tok is synchronized.
> > +	 * Update done counter which should always monotonically
> > +	 * increase (with wrapping considered).
> > +	 */
> > +	do {
> > +		t = atomic_read(&sync_sched_expedited_done);
> > +		if (t - tok >= 0)
> > +			break;
> > +	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&sync_sched_expedited_done, t, tok) != t);
> > +
> >  	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* ensure post-GP actions seen after GP. */
> >  	put_online_cpus();
> >  }
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-11  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-07  2:05 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/12] preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/12] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/12] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-09 13:26   ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-10  8:56     ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-11-11  4:20       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-11-11  9:10         ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:31           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-11 12:52             ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-07  2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101111042014.GE3134@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox