From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited()
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:31:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101111123146.GF3134@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDBB309.9020406@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:10:33AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Paul, Lai.
>
> On 11/11/2010 05:20 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:56:32PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> On 11/09/2010 09:26 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>> Hello, Paul.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How about something like the following? It's slightly bigger but I
> >>> think it's a bit easier to understand. Thanks.
> >>
> >> Hello, Paul, Tejun,
> >>
> >> I think this approach is good and much better when several tasks
> >> call synchronize_sched_expedited() at the same time.
> >
> > I am becoming more comfortable with it as well. Tejun, what kind of
> > testing did you do? Lai, could you please run it on your systems?
>
> I just compile tested it (so no SOB). Please feel free to take it and
> shape it into a proper patch. Oh, I think we can drop both mb()'s at
> the top and bottom as both atomic_inc_return() and atomic_cmpxchg()
> imply full memory barrier.
Actually, the memory barriers are still one source of discomfort to me.
I am concerned about the path out of the function that skips the
atomic_cmpxchg(), which seem to happen if some concurrent invocation
advances the "done" counter past us before we get around to checking it.
I agree on the atomic_inc_return() upon entry to the function, though.
And this is going to need some serious testing either way. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-07 2:05 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/12] preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/12] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/12] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-09 13:26 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-10 8:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-11-11 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-11 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:31 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-11-11 12:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101111123146.GF3134@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox