From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755708Ab0KMKCb (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:02:31 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:57742 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752868Ab0KMKC3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:02:29 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Xdlrpn3MIB+cEJZBuc16JFcsPJZuzknmEnsqyXXvahnOOJrVCKMl0hQWeIxjPLHqZi ndt1K6SJxMvQOeIURusBz8DXnm3eTddW7KDyhNbMErePNdc5FA4WhnrM9xDOry2u/gTE ZSSfQn1dSrsDBHafhKrO387ws++MO7LsRa0eo= Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:05:27 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nick Piggin , Jan Beulich , Avi Kivity , Xen-devel , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Virtualization , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] x86/ticketlock: Use C for __ticket_spin_unlock Message-ID: <20101113100527.GG3837@hack> References: <20092775a9df07a5a75820ac250194b535279d51.1288794124.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20092775a9df07a5a75820ac250194b535279d51.1288794124.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:59:44AM -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > * On PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, we use a locked operation to unlock > * (PPro errata 66, 92) > */ >-# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX LOCK_PREFIX >+static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_release(struct arch_spinlock *lock) >+{ >+ if (sizeof(lock->tickets.head) == sizeof(u8)) >+ asm (LOCK_PREFIX "incb %0" >+ : "+m" (lock->tickets.head) : : "memory"); >+ else >+ asm (LOCK_PREFIX "incw %0" >+ : "+m" (lock->tickets.head) : : "memory"); This 'if/else' really should be done with #ifdef, even though the compiler may be smart enough to remove it. >+ >+} > #else >-# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX >+static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_release(struct arch_spinlock *lock) >+{ >+ barrier(); >+ lock->tickets.head++; >+ barrier(); The second barrier() is not needed. Thanks.