public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	randy.dunlap@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	blp@cs.stanford.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lars_Ericsson@telia.com, kevin.granade@gmail.com,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Add generic exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) function
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:07:10 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101114133029.E008.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201011121044.40274.br1@einfach.org>

> > Why do ewma_init() and ewma_add() return their first argument?  They look
> > to me like they can be straight-forward void functions.
> 
> You are right, for ewma_init() it does not make sense.
> 
> For ewma_add() I think it does. This has been discussed before (e.g. 
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-10/msg09124.html).
> Some people might want to get the value when they add a sample by using 
> ewma_get(ewma_add(&ewma, val));

	ewma_add(&ewma, val);
	ewma_get(&ewma);

is enough simpler and cleaner. I don't oppse this :)



  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-14  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-11  3:47 [PATCH v6] Add generic exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) function Bruno Randolf
2010-11-11  3:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-11  3:59   ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-11  4:02 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-11  5:21   ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-11 18:17     ` Stefan Richter
2010-11-12  1:44       ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-14  5:07         ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-11-14  8:51           ` Stefan Richter
2010-11-15  2:10             ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-15  7:38               ` Stefan Richter
2010-11-15  7:50                 ` Bruno Randolf
2010-11-15  8:46                   ` Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-22  1:51 Bruno Randolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101114133029.E008.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Lars_Ericsson@telia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=blp@cs.stanford.edu \
    --cc=br1@einfach.org \
    --cc=kevin.granade@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox