public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: Avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:57:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101118155722.GC5374@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289573455-3410-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:50:55AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> From: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
> 
> The spin_lock_debug/rcu_cpu_stall detector uses
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() to dump cpu backtrace.
> Therefore it is possible that trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
> could be called at the same time on different CPUs, which
> triggers and 'unknown reason NMI' warning. The following case
> illustrates the problem:
> 
>       CPU1                    CPU2                     ...   CPU N
>                        trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
>                        set "backtrace_mask" to cpu mask
>                                |
> generate NMI interrupts  generate NMI interrupts       ...
>     \                          |                               /
>      \                         |                              /
> 
> The "backtrace_mask" will be cleaned by the first NMI interrupt
> at nmi_watchdog_tick(), then the following NMI interrupts generated
> by other cpus's arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() will be taken as
> unknown reason NMI interrupts.
> 
> This patch uses a test_and_set to avoid the problem, and stop the
> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() from calling to avoid dumping a
> double cpu backtrace info when there is already a
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() in progress.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: x86@kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> index f349647..d892896 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> @@ -27,9 +27,27 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(void)
>  /* For reliability, we're prepared to waste bits here. */
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(backtrace_mask, NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
>  
> +/* "in progress" flag of arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace */
> +static unsigned long backtrace_flag;
> +
>  void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Have to disable irq here, as the
> +	 * arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() could be
> +	 * triggered by "spin_lock()" with irqs on.
> +	 */
> +	local_irq_save(flags);



I'm not sure I understand why you disable irqs here. It looks
safe with the test_and_set_bit already.



> +
> +	if (test_and_set_bit(0, &backtrace_flag))
> +		/*
> +		 * If there is already a trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() in progress
> +		 * (backtrace_flag == 1), don't output double cpu dump infos.
> +		 */
> +		goto out_restore_irq;
>  
>  	cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(backtrace_mask), cpu_online_mask);
>  
> @@ -42,6 +60,12 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
>  			break;
>  		mdelay(1);
>  	}
> +
> +	clear_bit(0, &backtrace_flag);
> +	smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> +
> +out_restore_irq:
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  
>  static int __kprobes
> -- 
> 1.7.2.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-12 14:50 [PATCH 1/3] x86: only call smp_processor_id in non-preempt cases Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, hw_nmi: Move backtrace_mask declaration under ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time Don Zickus
2010-11-18 15:57   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-11-19  3:00     ` DDD
2010-11-18  8:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: only call smp_processor_id in non-preempt cases Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18 14:22   ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 14:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18 15:35       ` Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101118155722.GC5374@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=dongdong.deng@windriver.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox