From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: Avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:57:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101118155722.GC5374@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289573455-3410-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:50:55AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> From: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
>
> The spin_lock_debug/rcu_cpu_stall detector uses
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() to dump cpu backtrace.
> Therefore it is possible that trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
> could be called at the same time on different CPUs, which
> triggers and 'unknown reason NMI' warning. The following case
> illustrates the problem:
>
> CPU1 CPU2 ... CPU N
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
> set "backtrace_mask" to cpu mask
> |
> generate NMI interrupts generate NMI interrupts ...
> \ | /
> \ | /
>
> The "backtrace_mask" will be cleaned by the first NMI interrupt
> at nmi_watchdog_tick(), then the following NMI interrupts generated
> by other cpus's arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() will be taken as
> unknown reason NMI interrupts.
>
> This patch uses a test_and_set to avoid the problem, and stop the
> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() from calling to avoid dumping a
> double cpu backtrace info when there is already a
> trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() in progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: x86@kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> index f349647..d892896 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> @@ -27,9 +27,27 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(void)
> /* For reliability, we're prepared to waste bits here. */
> static DECLARE_BITMAP(backtrace_mask, NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
>
> +/* "in progress" flag of arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace */
> +static unsigned long backtrace_flag;
> +
> void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
> {
> int i;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /*
> + * Have to disable irq here, as the
> + * arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() could be
> + * triggered by "spin_lock()" with irqs on.
> + */
> + local_irq_save(flags);
I'm not sure I understand why you disable irqs here. It looks
safe with the test_and_set_bit already.
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(0, &backtrace_flag))
> + /*
> + * If there is already a trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() in progress
> + * (backtrace_flag == 1), don't output double cpu dump infos.
> + */
> + goto out_restore_irq;
>
> cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(backtrace_mask), cpu_online_mask);
>
> @@ -42,6 +60,12 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
> break;
> mdelay(1);
> }
> +
> + clear_bit(0, &backtrace_flag);
> + smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> +
> +out_restore_irq:
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> static int __kprobes
> --
> 1.7.2.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 14:50 [PATCH 1/3] x86: only call smp_processor_id in non-preempt cases Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, hw_nmi: Move backtrace_mask declaration under ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time Don Zickus
2010-11-18 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-11-19 3:00 ` DDD
2010-11-18 8:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: only call smp_processor_id in non-preempt cases Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18 14:22 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 14:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18 15:35 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101118155722.GC5374@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=dongdong.deng@windriver.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox