From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] memcg: make mem_cgroup_page_stat() return value unsigned
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:39:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101119113910.GD24635@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xr937hgixok4.fsf@ninji.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:41:15PM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
> >> mem_cgroup_page_stat() has changed so it never returns
> >> error so convert the return value to the traditional page
> >> count type (unsigned long).
> >
> > This changelog feels a bit beside the point.
> >
> > What's really interesting is that we now don't consider negative sums
> > to be invalid anymore, but just assume zero! There is a real
> > semantical change here.
>
> Prior to this patch series mem_cgroup_page_stat() returned a negative
> value (specifically -EINVAL) to indicate that the current task was in
> the root_cgroup and thus the per-cgroup usage and limit counter were
> invalid. Callers treated all negative values as an indication of
> root-cgroup message.
>
> Unfortunately there was another way that mem_cgroup_page_stat() could
> return a negative value even when current was not in the root cgroup.
> Negative sums were a possibility due to summing of unsynchronized
> per-cpu counters. These occasional negative sums would fool callers
> into thinking that the current task was in the root cgroup.
>
> Would adding this description to the commit message address your
> concerns?
I'd just describe that summing per-cpu counters is racy, that we can
end up with negative results, and the only sensible handling of that
is to assume zero.
> > That the return type can then be changed to unsigned long is a nice
> > follow-up cleanup that happens to be folded into this patch.
>
> Good point. I can separate the change into two sub-patches:
> 1. use zero for a min-value (as described above)
> 2. change return value to unsigned
Sounds good. You can just fold the previous patch (adjusting the
callsites) into 2, which should take care of the ordering problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 9:24 [PATCH 0/6] *** memcg: make throttle_vm_writeout() cgroup aware *** Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 9:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] memcg: add mem_cgroup parameter to mem_cgroup_page_stat() Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 22:53 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-10 0:51 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-16 3:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-11-22 6:40 ` Balbir Singh
2010-11-09 9:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] memcg: pass mem_cgroup to mem_cgroup_dirty_info() Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 23:09 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-16 3:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-11-22 6:41 ` Balbir Singh
2010-11-09 9:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] memcg: make throttle_vm_writeout() memcg aware Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 23:22 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-12 8:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-12 20:39 ` Greg Thelen
2010-11-16 3:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-11-19 11:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-09 9:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_page_stat() Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 23:36 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-12 8:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-12 20:40 ` Greg Thelen
2010-11-19 11:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-16 3:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-11-09 9:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_dirty_info() Greg Thelen
2010-11-10 1:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-12 8:21 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-12 20:40 ` Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 9:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] memcg: make mem_cgroup_page_stat() return value unsigned Greg Thelen
2010-11-09 12:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-10 1:04 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-12 8:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-12 20:41 ` Greg Thelen
2010-11-19 11:39 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2010-11-16 4:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101119113910.GD24635@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox