From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: core: do not put noninitialized devices
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:14:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101119191424.GA12273@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101119190242.GA14328@suse.de>
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:02 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:41:40PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > If kobject_set_name_vargs() fails then put_device() frees
> > device with zero kobj->state_initialized. This leads to WARN().
>
> Have you seen this happen?
No, I've just analized the code. Without device_initialize() ->kobj is
not initialized:
kobject_init(&dev->kobj, &device_ktype) calls
kobject_init_internal(kobj) calls
kobj->state_initialized = 1;
kobject_put() calls WARN if state_initialized == 0:
void kobject_put(struct kobject *kobj)
{
if (kobj) {
if (!kobj->state_initialized)
WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "kobject: '%s' (%p): is not "
"initialized, yet kobject_put() is being "
"called.\n", kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
I got the stack dump with similar code:
struct device *dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
put_device(dev);
> I'd prefer not to change this unless you are seeing problems with the
> current code.
>
> How did kobject_set_name_vargs() fail for you?
int kobject_set_name_vargs(struct kobject *kobj, const char *fmt,
va_list vargs)
{
[...]
kobj->name = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, vargs);
if (!kobj->name)
return -ENOMEM;
char *kvasprintf(gfp_t gfp, const char *fmt, va_list ap)
{
[...]
p = kmalloc(len+1, gfp);
if (!p)
return NULL;
Unlikely, but may fail in OOM situation.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-19 18:41 [PATCH] drivers: base: core: do not put noninitialized devices Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 19:02 ` Greg KH
2010-11-19 19:14 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2010-11-19 19:17 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 20:57 ` Greg KH
2010-11-20 9:00 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101119191424.GA12273@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox