From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, perf, nmi: Disable perf if counters are not accessable
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:04:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101123190417.GC5997@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290536827.2072.417.camel@laptop>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:27:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 19:21 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > Due to BIOS l(ocal)apic is not possible:
> >
> > # dmesg | grep -i apic
> > [ 0.000000] Using APIC driver default
> > [ 0.000000] Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- you can enable it with "lapic"
> > [ 0.000000] APIC: disable apic facility
> > [ 0.000000] APIC: switched to apic NOOP
> > [ 0.008891] no APIC, boot with the "lapic" boot parameter to force-enable it.
> > [ 0.036141] Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation.
>
> Have you tried booting with "lapic" as the second last msg suggests you
> do?
Peter, Don, might not we need something like the patch below -- ie to check for
apic earlier and do not acquire cpu for PERF cpu bit, and its cpu model, etc
if there is no active apic? And perhaps for nmi-watchdog, we should not try
to creat perf event for same reason and simply report that nmi-watchdog is
disabled (though of course hpet based one should try to continue).
No?
Cyrill
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
=====================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1329,14 +1329,16 @@ x86_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *
return ret;
}
-static void __init pmu_check_apic(void)
+static int __init pmu_check_apic(void)
{
if (cpu_has_apic)
- return;
+ return 0;
x86_pmu.apic = 0;
pr_info("no APIC, boot with the \"lapic\" boot parameter to force-enable it.\n");
pr_info("no hardware sampling interrupt available.\n");
+
+ return -1;
}
void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
@@ -1346,6 +1348,10 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
pr_info("Performance Events: ");
+ /* apic is required */
+ if (pmu_check_apic())
+ goto no_pmu;
+
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
err = intel_pmu_init();
@@ -1356,12 +1362,8 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
default:
return;
}
- if (err != 0) {
- pr_cont("no PMU driver, software events only.\n");
- return;
- }
-
- pmu_check_apic();
+ if (err != 0)
+ goto no_pmu;
pr_cont("%s PMU driver.\n", x86_pmu.name);
@@ -1411,6 +1413,12 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
perf_pmu_register(&pmu);
perf_cpu_notifier(x86_pmu_notifier);
+
+ return;
+
+no_pmu:
+ pr_cont("no PMU driver, software events only.\n");
+ return;
}
static inline void x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-23 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 15:15 [PATCH] x86, perf, nmi: Disable perf if counters are not accessable Sedat Dilek
2010-11-23 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-23 16:56 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-23 18:21 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-11-23 18:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-23 18:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-11-23 18:37 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-11-23 19:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-11-23 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-23 19:18 Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-22 21:55 Don Zickus
2010-11-23 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-23 14:13 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101123190417.GC5997@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox