From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org, roland@redhat.com,
rth@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
sam@ravnborg.org, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
michael@ellerman.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] jump label: add enabled/disabled state to jump label key entries
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:24:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101124002411.GA29158@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290556830.30543.415.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:43 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Jason Baron (jbaron@redhat.com) wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +static void update_jump_label_module(struct module *mod)
> > > +{
> > > + struct hlist_head *head;
> > > + struct hlist_node *node, *node_next, *module_node, *module_node_next;
> > > + struct jump_label_entry *e;
> > > + struct jump_label_module_entry *e_module;
> > > + struct jump_entry *iter;
> > > + int i, count;
> > > +
> > > + /* if the module doesn't have jump label entries, just return */
> > > + if (!mod->num_jump_entries)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < JUMP_LABEL_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> > > + head = &jump_label_table[i];
> > > + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(e, node, node_next, head, hlist) {
> > > + if (!e->enabled)
> > > + continue;
> > > + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(e_module, module_node,
> > > + module_node_next,
> > > + &(e->modules), hlist) {
> > > + if (e_module->mod != mod)
> > > + continue;
> >
> > Ouch.
> >
> > Could you iterate on the loaded/unloaded module jump labels and do hash
> > table lookups rather than doing this O(n^3) iteration ?
>
> This does not look O(n^3) to me.
>
> It's a hash table, thus the first two loops is just iterating O(n) items
> in the hash.
Good point.
>
> And the third loop is all the modules that use a particular event.
>
> So it is O(n*m) where n is the number of events, and m is the number of
> modules attached to the events. And that's only if all events are used
> by those modules. The actual case is much smaller.
Still, I wonder if the O(n) iteration on all events could be shrinked to
an interation on only the events present in the loaded/unloaded module ?
I think I did something like that for immediate values already. It might
apply (or not) here, just a thought.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-24 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 21:27 [PATCH 0/3] jump label: updates for 2.6.37 Jason Baron
2010-11-23 21:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] jump label: add enabled/disabled state to jump label key entries Jason Baron
2010-11-23 23:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 0:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 0:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-11-24 18:24 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 18:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 19:07 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 14:54 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 15:19 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 15:42 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 15:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-25 2:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-11-25 6:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-25 13:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-25 13:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-11-25 21:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-11-24 16:56 ` David Daney
2010-11-24 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 15:21 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 15:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 19:18 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-24 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-23 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] jump label: move jump table to r/w section Jason Baron
2010-11-23 23:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 0:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 0:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 0:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 2:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 2:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-23 21:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] jump label: add docs Jason Baron
2010-11-23 21:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] jump label: updates for 2.6.37 H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-23 23:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-23 23:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-24 0:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 0:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 0:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-23 21:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-23 21:56 ` Jason Baron
2010-11-23 23:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 9:21 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-24 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-11-24 13:49 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101124002411.GA29158@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox