From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [thisops uV2 02/10] vmstat: Optimize zone counter modifications through the use of this cpu operations
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:49:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101127144949.GC15365@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101126210950.142747403@linux.com>
* Christoph Lameter (cl@linux.com) wrote:
> this cpu operations can be used to slightly optimize the function. The
> changes will avoid some address calculations and replace them with the
> use of the percpu segment register.
>
> If one would have this_cpu_inc_return and this_cpu_dec_return then it
> would be possible to optimize inc_zone_page_state and dec_zone_page_state even
> more.
Then we might want to directly target the implementation with
this_cpu_add_return/this_cpu_sub_return (you implement these in patch 03), which
would not need to disable preemption on the fast path. I think we already
discussed this in the past. The reason eludes me at the moment, but I remember
discussing that changing the increment/decrement delta to the nearest powers of
two would let us deal with overflow cleanly. But it's probably too early in the
morning for me to wrap my head around the issue at the moment.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> V1->V2:
> - Fix __dec_zone_state overflow handling
> - Use s8 variables for temporary storage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>
> ---
> mm/vmstat.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/vmstat.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/vmstat.c 2010-11-24 13:38:34.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/vmstat.c 2010-11-24 15:03:08.000000000 -0600
> @@ -167,18 +167,20 @@ static void refresh_zone_stat_thresholds
> void __mod_zone_page_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item,
> int delta)
> {
> - struct per_cpu_pageset *pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset);
> -
> - s8 *p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
> + struct per_cpu_pageset * __percpu pcp = zone->pageset;
> + s8 * __percpu p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
> long x;
> + long t;
> +
> + x = delta + __this_cpu_read(*p);
>
> - x = delta + *p;
> + t = __this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
>
> - if (unlikely(x > pcp->stat_threshold || x < -pcp->stat_threshold)) {
> + if (unlikely(x > t || x < -t)) {
> zone_page_state_add(x, zone, item);
> x = 0;
> }
> - *p = x;
> + __this_cpu_write(*p, x);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mod_zone_page_state);
>
> @@ -221,16 +223,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mod_zone_page_state);
> */
> void __inc_zone_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item)
> {
> - struct per_cpu_pageset *pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset);
> - s8 *p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
> -
> - (*p)++;
> + struct per_cpu_pageset * __percpu pcp = zone->pageset;
> + s8 * __percpu p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
> + s8 v, t;
> +
> + __this_cpu_inc(*p);
> +
> + v = __this_cpu_read(*p);
> + t = __this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
> + if (unlikely(v > t)) {
> + s8 overstep = t >> 1;
>
> - if (unlikely(*p > pcp->stat_threshold)) {
> - int overstep = pcp->stat_threshold / 2;
> -
> - zone_page_state_add(*p + overstep, zone, item);
> - *p = -overstep;
> + zone_page_state_add(v + overstep, zone, item);
> + __this_cpu_write(*p, - overstep);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -242,16 +247,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__inc_zone_page_state);
>
> void __dec_zone_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item)
> {
> - struct per_cpu_pageset *pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset);
> - s8 *p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
> -
> - (*p)--;
> -
> - if (unlikely(*p < - pcp->stat_threshold)) {
> - int overstep = pcp->stat_threshold / 2;
> + struct per_cpu_pageset * __percpu pcp = zone->pageset;
> + s8 * __percpu p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
> + s8 v, t;
> +
> + __this_cpu_dec(*p);
> +
> + v = __this_cpu_read(*p);
> + t = __this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
> + if (unlikely(v < - t)) {
> + s8 overstep = t >> 1;
>
> - zone_page_state_add(*p - overstep, zone, item);
> - *p = overstep;
> + zone_page_state_add(v - overstep, zone, item);
> + __this_cpu_write(*p, overstep);
> }
> }
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-27 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-26 21:09 [thisops uV2 00/10] Upgrade of this_cpu_ops V2 Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 01/10] percpucounter: Optimize __percpu_counter_add a bit through the use of this_cpu() options Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 14:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 02/10] vmstat: Optimize zone counter modifications through the use of this cpu operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 8:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-27 14:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-11-29 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-29 17:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-29 19:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-29 20:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-29 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 03/10] percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_add,sub,dec,inc_return Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 14:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-29 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 04/10] x86: Support " Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 8:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-29 16:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 15:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-29 16:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-29 18:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-29 18:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-29 19:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-29 20:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 05/10] x86: Use this_cpu_inc_return for nmi counter Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 8:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-27 15:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 06/10] vmstat: Use this_cpu_inc_return for vm statistics Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 8:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-29 16:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 07/10] highmem: Use this_cpu_xx_return() operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 08/10] percpu: generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 09/10] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-27 6:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-27 15:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-29 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 21:09 ` [thisops uV2 10/10] slub: Lockless fastpaths Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101127144949.GC15365@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox