From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: Make the instruction emulator aware of Nested Virtualization
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129183212.GD15575@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11557.1291051418@localhost>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:23:38PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> (Sorry for late reply...)
>
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:23:13 +0100, "Roedel, Joerg" said:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:17:53AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 11/25/2010 03:13 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > > What about things like adding instructions and forgetting to add the
> > > corresponding svm.c code?
> > Cannot happen. Every instruction that can be intercepted with SVM is
> > already handled in this patch-set.
>
> Call us back when Intel releases the i9 and i11 with new instructions
> that need intercept handling. ;)
How does that affect SVM?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-24 18:18 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: Make the instruction emulator aware of Nested Virtualization Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: Add infrastructure to emulate instruction intercepts Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: SVM: Add checks for CRx read and write intercepts Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: SVM: Add checks for DRx " Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: SVM: Add intercept checks for descriptor table accesses Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: SVM: Add checks for all group 7 instructions Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: SVM: Add intercept checks for remaining twobyte instructions Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: SVM: Add intercept checks for one-byte instructions Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: SVM: Add checks for IO instructions Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: SVM: Remove nested sel_cr0_write handling code Joerg Roedel
2010-11-24 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: Make the instruction emulator aware of Nested Virtualization Avi Kivity
2010-11-25 11:46 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-25 13:13 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-25 15:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-25 16:23 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-29 17:23 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 18:32 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-11-29 20:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-30 8:47 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-25 15:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-25 18:21 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-11-26 8:28 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101129183212.GD15575@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox