linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tmhikaru@gmail.com
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>,
	tmhikaru@gmail.com, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Subject: Re: High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:40:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129194041.GA8280@roll> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291030726.32004.4.camel@laptop>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2020 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:38:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 12:40 +0100, Damien Wyart wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2010-11-27 21:15]:
> > > How does this work for you? Its hideous but lets start simple.
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Doesn't give wrong numbers like initial bug and tentative patches, but
> > feels a bit too slow when numbers go up and down. Correct values are
> > reached when waiting long enough, but it feels slow.
> > 
> > As I've tested many combinations, maybe this is an impression because
> > I do not remember about "normal" delays for the load to rise and fall,
> > but this still feels slow.
> 
> You can test this by either booting with nohz=off, or builting with
> CONFIG_NO_HZ=n and then comparing the result, something like
> 
> make O=defconfig clean; while sleep 10; do uptime >> load.log; done &
> make -j32 O=defconfig; kill %1
> 
> And comparing the curves between the NO_HZ and !NO_HZ kernels.
> 
> I'll try and make the patch less hideous ;-)

I've tested this patch on my own use case, and it seems to work for the most
part - it's still not settling as low as the previous implementation used
to, nor is it settling as low as CONFIG_NO_HZ=N (that is to say, 0.00 across
the board when not being used) however, this is definitely an improvement:

14:26:04 up  9:08,  5 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.01, 0.00

This is the result of running uptime on a checked out version of
[74f5187ac873042f502227701ed1727e7c5fbfa9] sched: Cure load average vs NO_HZ woes

with the patch applied, starting X, and simply letting the machine sit idle
for nine hours. For the brief period I spent watching it after boot, it
quickly began settling down to a reasonable value, I only let it sit idle
this long to verify the loadavg was consistently low. (the loadavg was
consistently erratic, anywhere from 0.6 to 1.2 with the machine idle without
this patch)

Thank you for the hard work,
Tim McGrath

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-29 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-29  7:01 High CPU load when machine is idle Damien Wyart
2010-10-14 14:58 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) Damien Wyart
2010-10-14 15:29   ` Chase Douglas
2010-10-14 15:56     ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-15 11:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 12:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 13:27   ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-20 13:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 13:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 14:14         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 14:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 17:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 20:24             ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-21  1:48             ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21  1:53               ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21  8:22                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-21  8:57                   ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 18:36               ` tmhikaru
2010-10-22  1:37                 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 12:09             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-21 17:18               ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-22 21:03                 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-22 23:03                 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-23  2:13                   ` tmhikaru
2010-10-25 10:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-25 16:29                     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-26 12:44                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-26 14:05                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 19:42                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 18:55                           ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-09 19:02                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10  2:37                               ` tmhikaru
2010-11-10 12:01                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10  3:45                               ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-10 12:00                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-14  5:14                                   ` tmhikaru
2010-11-25 13:31                                     ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-25 14:03                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-27 20:15                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-28  4:26                                           ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-28 11:40                                           ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-28 18:07                                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 11:38                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 19:40                                               ` tmhikaru [this message]
2010-11-29 23:01                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 14:59                                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 15:39                                                     ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-30 20:04                                                       ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-30 16:53                                                     ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-30 17:29                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:27                                                     ` tmhikaru
2010-12-02 10:16                                                       ` tmhikaru
2010-12-08 20:40                                                     ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Cure more NO_HZ load average woes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 20:01                                                   ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) tmhikaru
2010-11-30 16:49                                               ` Damien Wyart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101129194041.GA8280@roll \
    --to=tmhikaru@gmail.com \
    --cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
    --cc=damien.wyart@free.fr \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).