From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: demultiplex xfs_icsb_modify_counters()
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:38:17 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130043817.GE3556@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101129091920.GB13902@infradead.org>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:19:20AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:36:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >
> > With the conversion to percpu counters, xfs_icsb_modify_counters() really does
> > not need to exist. Convert the inode counter modifications to use a common
> > helper function for the one place that calls them, and add another function for
> > the free block modification and convert all the callers to use that.
>
> > +xfs_icsb_modify_inodes(
> > + xfs_mount_t *mp,
>
> struct xfs_mount, please.
>
> > + int cntr,
> > + int64_t delta,
> > + int rsvd)
>
> the rsvd argument isn't used at all.
>
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + ASSERT(cntr == XFS_ICSB_ICOUNT || cntr == XFS_ICSB_IFREE);
> > +
> > + ret = xfs_icsb_add(mp, cntr, delta, 0);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + ASSERT(0);
> > + return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
>
> You could get rdif of the ret argument as we don't care about the
> value. I also don't think we need the assert here - the caller already
> does one for us.
>
> > +xfs_icsb_modify_free_blocks(
> > + xfs_mount_t *mp,
>
> same here.
Ok, makes sense. I'll clean it up.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-30 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 0:36 [PATCH 0/3] Use generic percpu counters in XFS Dave Chinner
2010-11-29 0:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib: percpu counter add unless less than functionality Dave Chinner
2010-11-29 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 4:30 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-29 0:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use generic per-cpu counter infrastructure Dave Chinner
2010-11-29 9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-30 4:37 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-29 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: demultiplex xfs_icsb_modify_counters() Dave Chinner
2010-11-29 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-30 4:38 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-13 1:21 [PATCH 0/3] Use generic percpu counters in XFS V2 Dave Chinner
2010-12-13 1:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: demultiplex xfs_icsb_modify_counters() Dave Chinner
2010-12-16 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101130043817.GE3556@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox