From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:23:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130222328.GB17222@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=73VQeBj_M_PJO5OzJJDgWOXHkw31tN4z-nqMu@mail.gmail.com>
* Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> [101130 14:10]:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Do we even need the hwspin_lock variants,
>
> I personally don't have any specific use case in mind.
>
> It's just a simple wrapper over the _timeout variants, provided for
> API completeness, but -
>
> > why can't we always use the hwspin_lock_timeout variants?
>
> We can. I can just remove the _lock variants.
OK sounds good to me.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-30 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 15:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce common hardware spinlock interface Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-23 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-24 7:44 ` Kamoolkar, Mugdha
2010-11-24 19:59 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-25 3:59 ` David Brownell
2010-11-25 6:40 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-25 20:22 ` David Brownell
2010-11-26 7:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-27 1:24 ` David Brownell
2010-11-29 9:57 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-25 6:05 ` Kamoolkar, Mugdha
2010-11-25 14:29 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-26 4:59 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-26 7:18 ` Grant Likely
2010-11-26 21:00 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-26 8:53 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-26 9:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 10:16 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-26 10:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 22:18 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-26 22:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 9:46 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-26 22:51 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-29 21:31 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-30 19:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-11-30 22:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-30 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2010-11-23 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add OMAP implementation Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-23 23:23 ` Ionut Nicu
2010-11-24 10:33 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-23 15:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] OMAP4: hwmod data: Add hwspinlock Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-23 15:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] omap: add hwspinlock device Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101130222328.GB17222@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=h-kanigeri2@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox