From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755895Ab0LASDI (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:03:08 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34352 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755720Ab0LASDE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:03:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:03:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20101201.100330.226770021.davem@davemloft.net> To: npiggin@kernel.dk Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Nick Piggin Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:15:58 +1100 > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/npiggin/linux-npiggin.git vfs-scale-working Just want to say that I've been running this code for the past few days on my 128 cpu box and it seems quite sturdy. If there are any kinds of vfs benchmarks you want me to run on this machine both with and without the scaling changes, just let me know.