From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756274Ab0LATCB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:02:01 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:65034 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753581Ab0LATCA (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:02:00 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=D0BWzJjGEn0dv0ZlMZ1QLvR5z6LZDs/T0XWOS2r4jlszxSupESfJu1a7aM00wl3sK5 Ct99CT4ntFwe80Yg43KQO53nnBaKmimpT9nDSPIFD0169oU/1q/icYjs3uYqSMcldztz 7qIZCx9OHMXO4He8NPY2utloUjwZZxjsD7JoQ= Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:01:55 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Don Zickus , Ingo Molnar , Robert Richter , ying.huang@intel.com, Andi Kleen , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86, NMI: Remove DIE_NMI_IPI and add priorties to handlers Message-ID: <20101201190155.GC6478@lenovo> References: <1291156050-4482-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1291156050-4482-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <20101201184128.GB6478@lenovo> <1291229622.32004.1886.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1291229622.32004.1886.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:53:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: ... > > > > Don, maybe switching to say new chains like chain_perf and friends would be > > more readable/clean? I'm not against this patch by any means, but just a thought ;) > > Its a single event (NMI) so we only need a single notifier list, the > current one seems to be just fine. > OK, i'm fine with either, just a thought Cyrill