From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Disable ASPM if BIOS asks us to
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 23:24:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012022324.31760.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291326904-14822-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com>
On Thursday, December 02, 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> We currently refuse to touch the ASPM registers if the BIOS tells us that
> ASPM isn't supported. This can cause problems if the BIOS has (for any
> reason) enabled ASPM on some devices anyway. Change the code such that we
> explicitly clear ASPM if the FADT indicates that ASPM isn't supported,
> and make sure we tidy up appropriately on device removal in order to deal
> with the hotplug case. If ASPM is disabled because the BIOS doesn't hand
> over control then we won't touch the registers.
Good catch, but I'd rather use a separate function pcie_disable_aspm() to handle
the "BIOS tells us there's no ASPM" case and leave pcie_no_aspm() as is.
The, you might avoid a couple of changes.
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pci-aspm.h | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index 24e19c5..e2c47cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
>
> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
> printk(KERN_INFO"ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it\n");
> - pcie_no_aspm();
> + pcie_no_aspm(true);
> }
>
> ret = register_acpi_bus_type(&acpi_pci_bus);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 7122281..08a2232 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct pcie_link_state {
> struct aspm_latency acceptable[8];
> };
>
> -static int aspm_disabled, aspm_force;
> +static int aspm_disabled, aspm_force, aspm_clear_state;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(aspm_lock);
> static LIST_HEAD(link_list);
>
> @@ -498,6 +498,10 @@ static int pcie_aspm_sanity_check(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct pci_dev *child;
> int pos;
> u32 reg32;
> +
> + if (aspm_clear_state)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * Some functions in a slot might not all be PCIe functions,
> * very strange. Disable ASPM for the whole slot
> @@ -563,12 +567,15 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct pcie_link_state *link;
> int blacklist = !!pcie_aspm_sanity_check(pdev);
>
> - if (aspm_disabled || !pci_is_pcie(pdev) || pdev->link_state)
> + if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev) || pdev->link_state)
> return;
> if (pdev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> pdev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)
> return;
>
> + if (aspm_disabled && !aspm_clear_state)
> + return;
> +
> /* VIA has a strange chipset, root port is under a bridge */
> if (pdev->pcie_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> pdev->bus->self)
> @@ -641,7 +648,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self;
> struct pcie_link_state *link, *root, *parent_link;
>
> - if (aspm_disabled || !pci_is_pcie(pdev) ||
> + if ((aspm_disabled && !aspm_clear_state) || !pci_is_pcie(pdev) ||
> !parent || !parent->link_state)
> return;
> if ((parent->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) &&
> @@ -899,10 +906,13 @@ static int __init pcie_aspm_disable(char *str)
>
> __setup("pcie_aspm=", pcie_aspm_disable);
>
> -void pcie_no_aspm(void)
> +void pcie_no_aspm(bool clear)
> {
> - if (!aspm_force)
> + if (!aspm_force) {
> aspm_disabled = 1;
> + if (clear)
> + aspm_clear_state = clear;
Well, is the if(clear) really necessary?
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index a9c222d..bb0fda1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> err = pcie_port_platform_notify(dev, &cap_mask);
> if (pcie_ports_auto) {
> if (err) {
> - pcie_no_aspm();
> + pcie_no_aspm(false);
> return 0;
> }
> } else {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> index f9033e1..87f5343 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int __init pcie_portdrv_init(void)
> int retval;
>
> if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
> - pcie_no_aspm();
> + pcie_no_aspm(false);
> return -EACCES;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-aspm.h b/include/linux/pci-aspm.h
> index 91ba0b3..c7176a6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-aspm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-aspm.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ extern void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> extern void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> extern void pcie_aspm_pm_state_change(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> extern void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> -extern void pcie_no_aspm(void);
> +extern void pcie_no_aspm(bool clear_state);
> #else
> static inline void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline void pcie_no_aspm(void)
> +static inline void pcie_no_aspm(bool clear_state)
> {
> }
> #endif
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 21:55 [PATCH] PCI: Disable ASPM if BIOS asks us to Matthew Garrett
2010-12-02 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-12-02 22:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-12-02 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-02 22:55 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012022324.31760.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox