From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] mm: Remove likely() from grab_cache_page_write_begin()
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:58:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101207021329.476854013@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101207015834.196176991@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0005-mm-Remove-likely-from-grab_cache_page_write_begin.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2405 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Running the annotated branch profiler on a box doing average work
(firefox, evolution, xchat, distcc farm), the likely() used in
grab_cache_page_write_begin() was incorrect most of the time:
correct incorrect % Function File Line
------- --------- - -------- ---- ----
1924262 71332401 97 grab_cache_page_write_begin filemap.c 2206
Adding a trace_printk() and running the function tracer limited to
just this function I can see:
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268935: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=7
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268946: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268947: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=8
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268959: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268960: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=9
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268972: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268973: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=10
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268991: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268992: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=11
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.269005: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
Which shows that a lot of calls from ext3_write_begin will result in
the page returned by "find_lock_page" will be NULL.
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index ea89840..d557fe7 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2218,7 +2218,7 @@ struct page *grab_cache_page_write_begin(struct address_space *mapping,
gfp_notmask = __GFP_FS;
repeat:
page = find_lock_page(mapping, index);
- if (likely(page))
+ if (page)
return page;
page = __page_cache_alloc(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~gfp_notmask);
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 1:58 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] incorrect unlikely() and likely() cleanups Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] sched: Change rt_task(prev) in pre_schedule_rt to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 3:25 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-07 3:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] mm: Remove likely() from mapping_unevictable() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 7:02 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 13:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-10 7:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-10 7:06 ` Joe Perches
2010-12-10 8:08 ` Miles Bader
2010-12-11 0:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 9:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-07 13:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:09 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-11 0:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] sched: Change pick_next_task_rt from unlikely to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:46 ` Gregory Haskins
2010-12-07 2:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-12-07 2:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] mm: Remove likely() from grab_cache_page_write_begin() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] sched: Remove unlikely() from rt_policy() in sched.c Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] x86: Remove unlikey()s from sched_switch segment tests Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] fs: Remove unlikely() from fput_light() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] fs: Remove unlikely() from fget_light() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] sched: Remove unlikely() from ttwu_post_activation Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101207021329.476854013@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox