Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true

Tejun Heo
2010-12-11T00:10:04Z

On 12/11/2010 01:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are
>> busy processing works consecutively. Usually workers are of course
>> switching in and out of idle state all the time.
>>
>> How about just dropping likely/unlikely?
>
> OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by?

Sure, then, I'll route it through my tree.

Thanks.

--
tejun