Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true

Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11T00:12:20Z

On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 01:09 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 12/11/2010 01:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are
> >> busy processing works consecutively. Usually workers are of course
> >> switching in and out of idle state all the time.
> >>
> >> How about just dropping likely/unlikely?
> >
> > OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by?
>
> Sure, then, I'll route it through my tree.

OK, I'll post a new patch series again. Just pluck it from that, and let
me know so I can remove it from my tree.

Thanks,

-- Steve