From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/10] mm: Remove likely() from mapping_unevictable()
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:02:33 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101207070233.GB3307@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291688533.16223.119.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:22:13PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Resending to Nick's real email ]
>
>
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
>
> The mapping_unevictable() has a likely() around the mapping parameter.
> This mapping parameter comes from page_mapping() which has an
> unlikely() that the page will be set as PAGE_MAPPING_ANON, and if
> so, it will return NULL. One would think that this unlikely() means
> that the mapping returned by page_mapping() would not be NULL, but
> where page_mapping() is used just above mapping_unevictable(), that
> unlikely() is incorrect most of the time. This means that the
> "likely(mapping)" in mapping_unevictable() is incorrect most of the
> time.
>
> Running the annotated branch profiler on my main box which runs firefox,
> evolution, xchat and is part of my distcc farm, I had this:
>
> correct incorrect % Function File Line
> ------- --------- - -------- ---- ----
> 12872836 1269443893 98 mapping_unevictable pagemap.h 51
> 35935762 1270265395 97 page_mapping mm.h 659
> 1306198001 143659 0 page_mapping mm.h 657
> 203131478 121586 0 page_mapping mm.h 657
> 5415491 1116 0 page_mapping mm.h 657
> 74899487 1116 0 page_mapping mm.h 657
> 203132845 224 0 page_mapping mm.h 659
> 5415464 27 0 page_mapping mm.h 659
> 13552 0 0 page_mapping mm.h 657
> 13552 0 0 page_mapping mm.h 659
> 242630 0 0 page_mapping mm.h 657
> 242630 0 0 page_mapping mm.h 659
> 74899487 0 0 page_mapping mm.h 659
>
> The page_mapping() is a static inline, which is why it shows up multiple
> times. The mapping_unevictable() is also a static inline but seems to
> be used only once in my setup.
>
> The unlikely in page_mapping() was correct a total of 1909540379 times and
> incorrect 1270533123 times, with a 39% being incorrect. Perhaps this is
> enough to remove the unlikely from page_mapping() as well.
I think so. We don't have good guidelines or empirical numbers on this,
unfortunately, but I think it would be somewhere over 90%, given that it
tends to add jumps to and from out of line icache in the incorrect case.
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 1:58 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] incorrect unlikely() and likely() cleanups Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] sched: Change rt_task(prev) in pre_schedule_rt to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 3:25 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-07 3:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] mm: Remove likely() from mapping_unevictable() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 7:02 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-12-07 13:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-10 7:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-10 7:06 ` Joe Perches
2010-12-10 8:08 ` Miles Bader
2010-12-11 0:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 9:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-07 13:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:09 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-11 0:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] sched: Change pick_next_task_rt from unlikely to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:46 ` Gregory Haskins
2010-12-07 2:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] mm: Remove likely() from grab_cache_page_write_begin() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] sched: Remove unlikely() from rt_policy() in sched.c Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] x86: Remove unlikey()s from sched_switch segment tests Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] fs: Remove unlikely() from fput_light() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] fs: Remove unlikely() from fget_light() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] sched: Remove unlikely() from ttwu_post_activation Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101207070233.GB3307@amd \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox