From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] bind/unbind uevent
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:33:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101207183305.GA21802@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1012071814160.1998@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:29:37PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:18:27PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There is currently no generic trigger for userspace to know when a driver
> > > is bound to a device.
> >
> > Not true at all, you get one when a device is attached to a bus. What's
> > wrong with that notification?
> we get a KOBJ_ADD if a device is attached to a bus, but this does not
> imply that a device driver is bound to this device
You can get that information from that uevent, it's all there for you to
listen to.
> > > Such a trigger may be required in cases where setup
> > > steps must be performed in userspace after the device is bound, e.g.
> > > because the driver adds sysfs attributes in its probe function.
> >
> > A driver should not add sysfs attributes in its probe function as that
> > is racy as you have noticed. Add the attributes in the bus functions
> > for that driver and it should be fine.
> sry..I was not clear on this one. I was talking driver specific
> attributes per device.
No, I understand.
> So I'm searching for a trigger when these attributes are created, or
> in other words when the device is useable, which I think translates to
> when a driver is bound to this device.
Again, KOBJ_ADD is the correct one.
If your driver is creating sysfs attributes on its own, that's a bug and
should be fixed.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 16:18 [RFC] bind/unbind uevent Sebastian Ott
2010-12-07 16:27 ` Greg KH
2010-12-07 17:29 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-07 18:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-12-07 19:00 ` Kay Sievers
2010-12-08 10:18 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-08 16:02 ` Greg KH
2010-12-13 19:27 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-13 19:36 ` Greg KH
2010-12-14 18:26 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-14 19:29 ` Greg KH
2010-12-15 13:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-15 16:23 ` Greg KH
2010-12-15 17:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-15 17:51 ` Kay Sievers
2010-12-15 18:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-15 18:18 ` Greg KH
2010-12-16 10:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-08 10:16 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-08 16:01 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101207183305.GA21802@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox