From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754794Ab0LGU0q (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:26:46 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:36150 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753456Ab0LGU0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:26:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:18:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Greg KH Cc: Thomas Meyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review Message-ID: <20101207201851.GA11264@kroah.com> References: <20101119220309.GA15562@kroah.com> <1290268602.10615.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20101120155039.GA28803@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101120155039.GA28803@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:50:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 04:56:42PM +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 19.11.2010, 14:03 -0800 schrieb Greg KH: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.36.1 release. > > > There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and > > > wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > This one is missing and crashes my 2.6.36 kernel: > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22922 > > > > This was fixed in 2.6.37-rc1 in commit: a1c6c5698d53 (ext4: fix > > NULL pointer dereference in print_daily_error_info()) > > You need to get the ext4 maintainers to ack that and let me know about > it before I can add it. As the ext4 maintainers seem to ignoring the stable trees now for some reason, I'll just apply this and see who complains :) thanks, greg k-h